Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/1234: local variables in destructor ignored
       [not found] <20030605000629.21141.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
@ 2003-06-05 15:04 ` Andrew Cagney
  2003-06-05 16:28   ` David Carlton
  2003-06-05 21:59   ` Michael Vanier
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-06-05 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jimb, gdb, jimb, mvanier

[switch to gdb@]

> Synopsis: local variables in destructor ignored
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: jimb
> State-Changed-When: Thu Jun  5 00:06:29 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
>     Although it's not showing up on the web page, I have sent a reply to this explaining that G++ isn't emitting the right debug info.  If the submitter agrees, then we can close this and call it a G++ bug.
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=1234

Set it to category external.  I don't remember the decision on the 
state.  Suspended?  MichaelC?

Andrew



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/1234: local variables in destructor ignored
  2003-06-05 15:04 ` c++/1234: local variables in destructor ignored Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-06-05 16:28   ` David Carlton
  2003-06-05 21:59   ` Michael Vanier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Carlton @ 2003-06-05 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: jimb, gdb, mvanier

On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 11:04:26 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:

>> Although it's not showing up on the web page, I have sent a reply
>> to this explaining that G++ isn't emitting the right debug info.
>> If the submitter agrees, then we can close this and call it a G++
>> bug.

> Set it to category external.  I don't remember the decision on the
> state.  Suspended?

State=suspended.  You could also use category=c++, class=external (to
make it easier for other people who encounter the same bug to find
it).  But don't suspend it until the G++ bug has been filed, and
reference the G++ bug in the history trail of our bug.

Also, somebody should add this to our test suite; I suppose I'm the
logical person to do that.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/1234: local variables in destructor ignored
  2003-06-05 15:04 ` c++/1234: local variables in destructor ignored Andrew Cagney
  2003-06-05 16:28   ` David Carlton
@ 2003-06-05 21:59   ` Michael Vanier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Vanier @ 2003-06-05 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ac131313; +Cc: jimb, gdb, jimb


FWIW I submitted a bug report to the GCC gnats system, ID 11098.

Mike

> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 11:04:26 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> 
> [switch to gdb@]
> 
> > Synopsis: local variables in destructor ignored
> > 
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> > State-Changed-By: jimb
> > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun  5 00:06:29 2003
> > State-Changed-Why:
> >     Although it's not showing up on the web page, I have sent a reply to this explaining that G++ isn't emitting the right debug info.  If the submitter agrees, then we can close this and call it a G++ bug.
> > 
> > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=1234
> 
> Set it to category external.  I don't remember the decision on the 
> state.  Suspended?  MichaelC?
> 
> Andrew
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-05 21:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20030605000629.21141.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
2003-06-05 15:04 ` c++/1234: local variables in destructor ignored Andrew Cagney
2003-06-05 16:28   ` David Carlton
2003-06-05 21:59   ` Michael Vanier

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox