Re: [6] What if EXTRA_FRAME_INFO wasn't required

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

> 
> Will try it out. I also identified a few macros that were not converted
> yet, but all of them should be easy to do, except one (FIX_CALL_DUMMY)
> which I understand should be replaced in the relatively near future.

I need to find an excuse for doing it.  Something as perverted as 
modifying the d10v to use generic dummy frames that are on the stack 
should do the trick :-)

I'm guessing that the entire dummy mess can be replaced with a single 
simple:

	push_dummy_breakpoint()

with a default implementation looking something like:

	BREAKPOINT_FROM_PC(addr, len, bytes);
	write_memory (addr, len, bytes);

> Can I commit your patch if it turns out to be working, or would you
> prefer to do it?

I've committed the bulk of it.  Suggest giving multi-arch partial a 
wirl.  Oh, I thought I glimpsed some ->frame or ->pc references in some 
of the HP code :-(

Andrew