From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12222 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2003 22:08:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12212 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2003 22:08:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2003 22:08:05 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BEB2B23; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:07:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3E93483A.9000102@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 22:08:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [6] What if EXTRA_FRAME_INFO wasn't required References: <3E84BFD5.3080304@redhat.com> <20030328213935.GZ924@gnat.com> <3E878942.3000700@redhat.com> <20030331223213.GF916@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 > > Will try it out. I also identified a few macros that were not converted > yet, but all of them should be easy to do, except one (FIX_CALL_DUMMY) > which I understand should be replaced in the relatively near future. I need to find an excuse for doing it. Something as perverted as modifying the d10v to use generic dummy frames that are on the stack should do the trick :-) I'm guessing that the entire dummy mess can be replaced with a single simple: push_dummy_breakpoint() with a default implementation looking something like: BREAKPOINT_FROM_PC(addr, len, bytes); write_memory (addr, len, bytes); > Can I commit your patch if it turns out to be working, or would you > prefer to do it? I've committed the bulk of it. Suggest giving multi-arch partial a wirl. Oh, I thought I glimpsed some ->frame or ->pc references in some of the HP code :-( Andrew