* [5.3] What's the hold up? @ 2002-11-20 9:50 Andrew Cagney 2002-11-20 10:43 ` Joel Brobecker 2002-11-20 10:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-11-20 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb If you search the bug data base for high GDB PR's you'll see: PR Category State Priority Responsible Synopsis 378 gdb suspended high unassigned ``GNU/Linux'' ``Linux kernel'' 394 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.1.1 contains intl/ droppings 527 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.2 incompatibilities with GNU textutils 2.0.21 in POSIX mode 676 gdb analyzed high unassigned Alpha OSF1, gcc, internal GDB error in mdebugread 708 gdb open high unassigned Can't build 5.3 branch (and probably trunk). 725 gdb open high unassigned Crash using debug target and regcaches (in 5.3 branch?) 763 gdb open high unassigned gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints 840 gdb suspended high unassigned Expect on GDB 5.3 branch doesn't build on IRIX 6.5 It is these (actually the non-suspended ones) that I'm trying to get flushed. Of most concern are 708 and 676. They both indicate something failing the: ./configure make ./gdb/gdb ./gdb/gdb (gdb) b main (gdb) run release criteria :-( Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [5.3] What's the hold up? 2002-11-20 9:50 [5.3] What's the hold up? Andrew Cagney @ 2002-11-20 10:43 ` Joel Brobecker 2002-11-20 10:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Joel Brobecker @ 2002-11-20 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb > 676 gdb analyzed high unassigned Alpha OSF1, gcc, internal GDB error in > mdebugread > 708 gdb open high unassigned Can't build 5.3 branch (and probably trunk). [...] > Of most concern are 708 and 676. They both indicate something failing the: > > ./configure > make > ./gdb/gdb ./gdb/gdb > (gdb) b main > (gdb) run I don't think that 676 is any worse than before, so I would not hold up 5.3 for this PR. I just tried your release criteria on Tru64 4.0f and 5.1a, and the test passed... My 2 cents... -- Joel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [5.3] What's the hold up? 2002-11-20 9:50 [5.3] What's the hold up? Andrew Cagney 2002-11-20 10:43 ` Joel Brobecker @ 2002-11-20 10:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-11-20 11:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-11-20 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:50:46PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > If you search the bug data base for high GDB PR's you'll see: > > PR Category State Priority Responsible Synopsis > 378 gdb suspended high unassigned ``GNU/Linux'' ``Linux kernel'' > 394 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.1.1 contains intl/ droppings > 527 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.2 incompatibilities with GNU > textutils 2.0.21 in POSIX mode > 676 gdb analyzed high unassigned Alpha OSF1, gcc, internal GDB error in > mdebugread > 708 gdb open high unassigned Can't build 5.3 branch (and probably trunk). > 725 gdb open high unassigned Crash using debug target and regcaches (in > 5.3 branch?) > 763 gdb open high unassigned gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints > 840 gdb suspended high unassigned Expect on GDB 5.3 branch doesn't build > on IRIX 6.5 > > It is these (actually the non-suspended ones) that I'm trying to get > flushed. > > Of most concern are 708 and 676. They both indicate something failing the: > > ./configure > make > ./gdb/gdb ./gdb/gdb > (gdb) b main > (gdb) run > > release criteria :-( I hit gdb/708 on HP/UX... it's really not that complicated to fix, I don't think... Of course trying to reproduce it I can't even build the snapshot; it tries to make distclean in itcl. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [5.3] What's the hold up? 2002-11-20 10:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-11-20 11:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-11-20 13:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-11-20 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney, gdb On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:52:27PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:50:46PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > If you search the bug data base for high GDB PR's you'll see: > > > > PR Category State Priority Responsible Synopsis > > 378 gdb suspended high unassigned ``GNU/Linux'' ``Linux kernel'' > > 394 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.1.1 contains intl/ droppings > > 527 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.2 incompatibilities with GNU > > textutils 2.0.21 in POSIX mode > > 676 gdb analyzed high unassigned Alpha OSF1, gcc, internal GDB error in > > mdebugread > > 708 gdb open high unassigned Can't build 5.3 branch (and probably trunk). > > 725 gdb open high unassigned Crash using debug target and regcaches (in > > 5.3 branch?) > > 763 gdb open high unassigned gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints > > 840 gdb suspended high unassigned Expect on GDB 5.3 branch doesn't build > > on IRIX 6.5 > > > > It is these (actually the non-suspended ones) that I'm trying to get > > flushed. > > > > Of most concern are 708 and 676. They both indicate something failing the: > > > > ./configure > > make > > ./gdb/gdb ./gdb/gdb > > (gdb) b main > > (gdb) run > > > > release criteria :-( > > I hit gdb/708 on HP/UX... it's really not that complicated to fix, I > don't think... > > Of course trying to reproduce it I can't even build the snapshot; it > tries to make distclean in itcl. However, my guess at a fix for gdb/708 is that dejagnu/Makefile.am needs a distclean-local to parallel clean-local, which distcleans in example/. The failure in itcl/ appears to be a configure script bug with autoconf 2.5. Keith fixed this on mainline on Sep. 5th: * configure.in (subdirs): New variable. Don't put AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS macro into configure.in twice: it confuses autoconf. Instead use the variable to hold the subdirs to be configured. * configure: Regenerated. This should probably go to the branch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [5.3] What's the hold up? 2002-11-20 11:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-11-20 13:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-11-20 21:09 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-11-20 21:09 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-11-20 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney, gdb On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:07:05PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:52:27PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:50:46PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > If you search the bug data base for high GDB PR's you'll see: > > > > > > PR Category State Priority Responsible Synopsis > > > 378 gdb suspended high unassigned ``GNU/Linux'' ``Linux kernel'' > > > 394 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.1.1 contains intl/ droppings > > > 527 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.2 incompatibilities with GNU > > > textutils 2.0.21 in POSIX mode > > > 676 gdb analyzed high unassigned Alpha OSF1, gcc, internal GDB error in > > > mdebugread > > > 708 gdb open high unassigned Can't build 5.3 branch (and probably trunk). > > > 725 gdb open high unassigned Crash using debug target and regcaches (in > > > 5.3 branch?) > > > 763 gdb open high unassigned gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints > > > 840 gdb suspended high unassigned Expect on GDB 5.3 branch doesn't build > > > on IRIX 6.5 > > > > > > It is these (actually the non-suspended ones) that I'm trying to get > > > flushed. > > > > > > Of most concern are 708 and 676. They both indicate something failing the: > > > > > > ./configure > > > make > > > ./gdb/gdb ./gdb/gdb > > > (gdb) b main > > > (gdb) run > > > > > > release criteria :-( > > > > I hit gdb/708 on HP/UX... it's really not that complicated to fix, I > > don't think... > > > > Of course trying to reproduce it I can't even build the snapshot; it > > tries to make distclean in itcl. > > However, my guess at a fix for gdb/708 is that dejagnu/Makefile.am > needs a distclean-local to parallel clean-local, which distcleans in > example/. > > The failure in itcl/ appears to be a configure script bug with autoconf > 2.5. Keith fixed this on mainline on Sep. 5th: > > * configure.in (subdirs): New variable. Don't put AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS > macro into configure.in twice: it confuses autoconf. Instead use > the variable to hold the subdirs to be configured. > * configure: Regenerated. > > This should probably go to the branch. It did, two months ago. I haven't cvs up'd that tree in longer than I had thought :) Try this patch for the DejaGNU droppings. And one in gdb/doc/. That wasn't so hard, was it? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer --- src/gdb/doc/Makefile.in 2002-11-20 15:48:51.000000000 -0500 +++ tsrc/gdb/doc/Makefile.in 2002-11-20 15:57:21.000000000 -0500 @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ rm -f gdb-cfg.texi distclean: clean - rm -f Makefile config.status + rm -f Makefile config.status config.log # GDBvn.texi, the dvi files, the info files, and the postscript files, # are all part of the distribution, so it should not be removed by --- src/dejagnu/Makefile.am 2002-04-21 04:46:47.000000000 -0400 +++ tsrc/dejagnu/Makefile.am 2002-11-20 16:35:17.000000000 -0500 @@ -34,10 +34,13 @@ # We don't use SUBDIRS, so the excample or test cases don't get built # by default for a "make all". clean-local: - cd doc ; $(MAKE) clean cd testsuite ; $(MAKE) clean cd example ; $(MAKE) clean +distclean-local: + cd testsuite ; $(MAKE) distclean + cd example ; $(MAKE) distclean + # Set ourselves up to build a RedHat package tarball: overview.html overview.ps overview.pdf -rm -fr dejagnu-${VERSION} --- src/dejagnu/Makefile.in 2002-09-02 07:53:24.000000000 -0400 +++ tsrc/dejagnu/Makefile.in 2002-11-20 16:35:31.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -# Makefile.in generated automatically by automake 1.4-p5 from Makefile.am +# Makefile.in generated automatically by automake 1.4 from Makefile.am -# Copyright (C) 1994, 1995-8, 1999, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +# Copyright (C) 1994, 1995-8, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # This Makefile.in is free software; the Free Software Foundation # gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it, # with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved. @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ DISTFILES = $(DIST_COMMON) $(SOURCES) $(HEADERS) $(TEXINFOS) $(EXTRA_DIST) -TAR = gtar +TAR = tar GZIP_ENV = --best EXPECT = expect all: all-redirect @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ dot_seen=no; \ rev=''; list='$(SUBDIRS)'; for subdir in $$list; do \ rev="$$subdir $$rev"; \ - test "$$subdir" != "." || dot_seen=yes; \ + test "$$subdir" = "." && dot_seen=yes; \ done; \ test "$$dot_seen" = "no" && rev=". $$rev"; \ target=`echo $@ | sed s/-recursive//`; \ @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ clean: clean-recursive -distclean-am: distclean-tags distclean-generic clean-am +distclean-am: distclean-tags distclean-generic clean-am distclean-local distclean: distclean-recursive -rm -f config.status @@ -443,10 +443,13 @@ # We don't use SUBDIRS, so the excample or test cases don't get built # by default for a "make all". clean-local: - cd doc ; $(MAKE) clean cd testsuite ; $(MAKE) clean cd example ; $(MAKE) clean +distclean-local: + cd testsuite ; $(MAKE) distclean + cd example ; $(MAKE) distclean + # Set ourselves up to build a RedHat package tarball: overview.html overview.ps overview.pdf -rm -fr dejagnu-${VERSION} ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [5.3] What's the hold up? 2002-11-20 13:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-11-20 21:09 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-11-20 21:09 ` Andrew Cagney 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-11-20 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:07:05PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:52:27PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:50:46PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> > > If you search the bug data base for high GDB PR's you'll see: >> > > >> > > PR Category State Priority Responsible Synopsis >> > > 378 gdb suspended high unassigned ``GNU/Linux'' ``Linux kernel'' >> > > 394 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.1.1 contains intl/ droppings >> > > 527 gdb suspended high unassigned GDB 5.2 incompatibilities with GNU >> > > textutils 2.0.21 in POSIX mode >> > > 676 gdb analyzed high unassigned Alpha OSF1, gcc, internal GDB error in >> > > mdebugread >> > > 708 gdb open high unassigned Can't build 5.3 branch (and probably trunk). >> > > 725 gdb open high unassigned Crash using debug target and regcaches (in >> > > 5.3 branch?) >> > > 763 gdb open high unassigned gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints >> > > 840 gdb suspended high unassigned Expect on GDB 5.3 branch doesn't build >> > > on IRIX 6.5 >> > > >> > > It is these (actually the non-suspended ones) that I'm trying to get >> > > flushed. >> > > >> > > Of most concern are 708 and 676. They both indicate something failing the: >> > > >> > > ./configure >> > > make >> > > ./gdb/gdb ./gdb/gdb >> > > (gdb) b main >> > > (gdb) run >> > > >> > > release criteria :-( > >> > >> > I hit gdb/708 on HP/UX... it's really not that complicated to fix, I >> > don't think... >> > >> > Of course trying to reproduce it I can't even build the snapshot; it >> > tries to make distclean in itcl. > >> >> However, my guess at a fix for gdb/708 is that dejagnu/Makefile.am >> needs a distclean-local to parallel clean-local, which distcleans in >> example/. >> >> The failure in itcl/ appears to be a configure script bug with autoconf >> 2.5. Keith fixed this on mainline on Sep. 5th: >> >> * configure.in (subdirs): New variable. Don't put AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS >> macro into configure.in twice: it confuses autoconf. Instead use >> the variable to hold the subdirs to be configured. >> * configure: Regenerated. >> >> This should probably go to the branch. > > > It did, two months ago. I haven't cvs up'd that tree in longer than I > had thought :) > > Try this patch for the DejaGNU droppings. And one in gdb/doc/. That > wasn't so hard, was it? I think these can go in. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [5.3] What's the hold up? 2002-11-20 13:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-11-20 21:09 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2002-11-20 21:09 ` Andrew Cagney 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-11-20 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb PS: Don't forget to send the deajgnu one up stream. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-21 5:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-11-20 9:50 [5.3] What's the hold up? Andrew Cagney 2002-11-20 10:43 ` Joel Brobecker 2002-11-20 10:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-11-20 11:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-11-20 13:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-11-20 21:09 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-11-20 21:09 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox