Re: libremote status?

["Fred Viles" <fv@epitools.com>]

Dang, bitten by the listserver (and my inattention) again.  Sorry for 
the PM, Chris.

------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	Fred Viles <fv@epitools.com>
To:             	Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Subject:        	Re: libremote status?
Date sent:      	Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:17:07 -0700

On 9 Oct 2002 at 15:03, Christopher Faylor wrote about
    "Re: libremote status?":

| On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:42:35PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
| >On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:39:53AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
| >I assume that, given the name change, there is no plan for RDA to be
| >contributed to the FSF?  And that, as such, there can be no effort to
| >combine all this beautiful server architecture with the fact that we
| >have a working gdbserver implementation, and active development on it?
| 
| We will not be releasing this to the FSF, no.  We still need to hold
| the copyright for various reasons.

OTOH, according to the comment blocks at the start of every file you 
are releasing it under the GPL.  Doesn't that mean that it can be 
incorporated into other GPL'ed projects pretty much without 
additional restriction?  I obviously son't understand the issues 
here...

- Fred

------- End of forwarded message -------