From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27893 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2002 02:19:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27880 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2002 02:19:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO epitools.com) (66.166.77.34) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 2002 02:19:05 -0000 Received: from FV (fv [205.158.243.63]) by epitools.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA17937 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:19:03 -0700 From: "Fred Viles" Organization: Embedded Performance, Inc. To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:19:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: libremote status? Reply-to: fv@epitools.com Message-ID: <3DA5D2A0.6277.13A0987@localhost> Priority: normal Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 Dang, bitten by the listserver (and my inattention) again. Sorry for the PM, Chris. ------- Forwarded message follows ------- From: Fred Viles To: Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: libremote status? Date sent: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:17:07 -0700 On 9 Oct 2002 at 15:03, Christopher Faylor wrote about "Re: libremote status?": | On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:42:35PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: | >On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:39:53AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: | >I assume that, given the name change, there is no plan for RDA to be | >contributed to the FSF? And that, as such, there can be no effort to | >combine all this beautiful server architecture with the fact that we | >have a working gdbserver implementation, and active development on it? | | We will not be releasing this to the FSF, no. We still need to hold | the copyright for various reasons. OTOH, according to the comment blocks at the start of every file you are releasing it under the GPL. Doesn't that mean that it can be incorporated into other GPL'ed projects pretty much without additional restriction? I obviously son't understand the issues here... - Fred ------- End of forwarded message -------