From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, hunt@redhat.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Alpha completely broken: build_regcache never called
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 06:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CAC61E0.7040300@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020404002511.A11444@nevyn.them.org>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:15:04AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> >I believe this patch is responsible:
>> >
>> >2002-03-20 Martin M. Hunt <hunt@redhat.com>
>> >
>> >* regcache.c (_initialize_regcache): No need to call
>> > build_regcache() at this time; it gets called whenever
>> > the gdbarch changes.
>> >
>> >Alpha is completely non-multi-arch. Thus the gdbarch appears to never
>> >change, and we crash very quickly.
>
>>
>> When non-multi-arch, that function should still be called via:
>>
>> initialize_non_multiarch ();
>>
>> is this not happening?
>
>
> That function only initializes things created with
> register_gdbarch_data... not register_gdbarch_swap. Adding a call to
> init_gdbarch_swap (&startup_gdbarch) in initialize_non_multiarch causes
> it to be called. Is that correct?
Er, yes :-( Does it ``work'' (between the other two functions to match
gdbarch_update_p())?
There could be a problem (memory leak, NULL test?) if code is doing the
sequence:
_initialize_foo()
-> build_foo()
....
_initialize_non_multiarch()
-> init_gdbarch_swap()
-> build_foo ()
but I think I can live with that (with liberal commenting :-) as it is
the non-multi-arch case.
This looks to also be a partial fix to gdb/438. The underlying problem
is still there but this further improves things.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-04 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-03 15:05 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-03 15:23 ` Martin M. Hunt
2002-04-03 21:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-03 21:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-04 6:23 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-04-04 8:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-05 18:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-05 18:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CAC61E0.7040300@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=cagney@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=hunt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox