* 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...?
@ 2001-11-16 14:34 Andrew Cagney
2001-11-17 11:19 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-11-27 0:57 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-11-16 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
[Yes, well, you know, um, hmm, er, there is a lot isn't there]
Can I suggest that the sentimental old far.s be given the oportunity to
delete their favorite targets (Stan Shebs and mac stuff? me and TiC80?
...) Sob, sniff.
As for some of the other stuff (#ifdef UI_OUT, obosolete commands) hmm,
yes, not sure what to do. Thoughts? An MI or CLI maintainer?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...?
2001-11-16 14:34 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...? Andrew Cagney
@ 2001-11-17 11:19 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-11-18 3:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-27 8:35 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-11-27 0:57 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2001-11-17 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> [Yes, well, you know, um, hmm, er, there is a lot isn't there]
>
> Can I suggest that the sentimental old far.s be given the oportunity to
> delete their favorite targets (Stan Shebs and mac stuff? me and TiC80?
> ...) Sob, sniff.
>
> As for some of the other stuff (#ifdef UI_OUT, obosolete commands) hmm,
> yes, not sure what to do. Thoughts? An MI or CLI maintainer?
>
I have been asking permission to get rid of these ifdef's for long.
As soon as I hear the word I will start cleaning it up.
I guess we already satisfied the requirement to leave them in for
one full release, right?
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...?
2001-11-17 11:19 ` Fernando Nasser
@ 2001-11-18 3:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-27 15:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-27 8:35 ` Fernando Nasser
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-11-18 3:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: gdb
> I have been asking permission to get rid of these ifdef's for long.
> As soon as I hear the word I will start cleaning it up.
> I guess we already satisfied the requirement to leave them in for
> one full release, right?
I think it was something like:
5.0 contained MI but not enabled - see if it got used
5.1 contained MI enabled - since it is being used
That way such a radical change didn't become the norm without hard
evidence that it was going to be used/maintained.
Anyway, 5.1 is out so yes the #ifdef UI_OUT can be stripped.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...?
2001-11-18 3:48 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2001-11-27 15:02 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-11-27 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: gdb
> I have been asking permission to get rid of these ifdef's for long.
> As soon as I hear the word I will start cleaning it up.
> I guess we already satisfied the requirement to leave them in for
> one full release, right?
I think it was something like:
5.0 contained MI but not enabled - see if it got used
5.1 contained MI enabled - since it is being used
That way such a radical change didn't become the norm without hard
evidence that it was going to be used/maintained.
Anyway, 5.1 is out so yes the #ifdef UI_OUT can be stripped.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...?
2001-11-17 11:19 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-11-18 3:48 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2001-11-27 8:35 ` Fernando Nasser
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2001-11-27 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> [Yes, well, you know, um, hmm, er, there is a lot isn't there]
>
> Can I suggest that the sentimental old far.s be given the oportunity to
> delete their favorite targets (Stan Shebs and mac stuff? me and TiC80?
> ...) Sob, sniff.
>
> As for some of the other stuff (#ifdef UI_OUT, obosolete commands) hmm,
> yes, not sure what to do. Thoughts? An MI or CLI maintainer?
>
I have been asking permission to get rid of these ifdef's for long.
As soon as I hear the word I will start cleaning it up.
I guess we already satisfied the requirement to leave them in for
one full release, right?
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...?
2001-11-16 14:34 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...? Andrew Cagney
2001-11-17 11:19 ` Fernando Nasser
@ 2001-11-27 0:57 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-11-27 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
[Yes, well, you know, um, hmm, er, there is a lot isn't there]
Can I suggest that the sentimental old far.s be given the oportunity to
delete their favorite targets (Stan Shebs and mac stuff? me and TiC80?
...) Sob, sniff.
As for some of the other stuff (#ifdef UI_OUT, obosolete commands) hmm,
yes, not sure what to do. Thoughts? An MI or CLI maintainer?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-27 23:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-16 14:34 5.1 is out, can I finally delete ... blah ...? Andrew Cagney
2001-11-17 11:19 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-11-18 3:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-27 15:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-27 8:35 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-11-27 0:57 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox