Re: GDB 5.1/mi status and question on table output

[Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>]

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> Which brings up option (B).
> 
> Should, for 5.1 the existing table->tuple functions be left as is?
> A new interface that directly maps table calls on to correct list/tuple
> functions could then be added instead.
> 

Several interfaces provide a simplifies result for those who can consume
it (i.e., don't need any of what was left behind), so I think this is a
good idea.  But, as you say, let's wait for people to ask for it.  The
best way of testing this things is by letting people go and use it.  I
just hope they do give us the feedback and the suggestions for
improvement.

Cheers,
Fernando

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9