From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fernando Nasser To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Fernando Nasser , GDB Discussion Subject: Re: GDB 5.1/mi status and question on table output Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:13:00 -0000 Message-id: <3B012AD6.75DFD152@redhat.com> References: <3B0010FC.3060908@cygnus.com> <3B002B28.23F0009B@cygnus.com> <3B007CE2.7080308@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00259.html Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Which brings up option (B). > > Should, for 5.1 the existing table->tuple functions be left as is? > A new interface that directly maps table calls on to correct list/tuple > functions could then be added instead. > Several interfaces provide a simplifies result for those who can consume it (i.e., don't need any of what was left behind), so I think this is a good idea. But, as you say, let's wait for people to ask for it. The best way of testing this things is by letting people go and use it. I just hope they do give us the feedback and the suggestions for improvement. Cheers, Fernando -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9