From: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb Digest 7 Nov 2003 16:00:26 -0000 Issue 1325
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3432BCBC-1148-11D8-8D8B-000A277A8808@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1068220826.2391.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
Elena,
On Nov 7, 2003, at 8:00 AM, gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com wrote:
> the objc support is in gdb mainline and it has been there for a while.
> There are some bugs still, but it was merged.
> Are you referring to something else?
Yes, I was referring to the very beginnings of Adam's work. Since the
tarball of the Apple sources were sitting on the FSF site, he naturally
started from there. But since they had been sitting for a while, the
first task he faced was reconciling the changes in the relevant areas
of the tarball with the changes in the FSF sources between the time the
tarball was dropped and when he got it. At that time, we were keeping
pretty current with the FSF distro, so we had done this job already -
and the results were readily available in our CVS repository. IIRC, we
figured out what was going on pretty quickly and set him straight, but
that is the sort of pointless duplication of effort that it would be
good to avoid.
>
> Same story for the interpreter stuff which Keith, Andrew and I merged.
>
I am pretty sure Keith worked from our CVS repository, at least that is
what I urged him to do. By the time you & Andrew got to it, I think
the work was pretty far along, so you probably didn't have any need to
refer to our version.
> I think we went through this before, with the previoius tarball. If
> it's too hard a requirement, then let's forget about it. We'll live
> with the status quo.
It is obviously not hard but I worry it is likely to be
counter-productive. That was what we "went through before" and the
event somewhat justified my concerns.
Pointing folks at our CVS repository is much easier, and we even have
anonymous access now for those who don't want to give out their e-mail
addresses... Plus then they have all the benefits of CVS in trying to
figure out why we did all the screwy things we did...
Jim
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Jim Ingham
jingham@apple.com
Developer Tools - gdb
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-07 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1068220826.2391.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-11-07 17:31 ` Jim Ingham [this message]
2003-11-07 18:03 ` Mark Newman
2003-11-07 19:16 ` Jim Ingham
2003-11-07 21:24 ` Mark Newman
2003-11-07 18:04 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-11-07 19:12 ` Jim Ingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3432BCBC-1148-11D8-8D8B-000A277A8808@apple.com \
--to=jingham@apple.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox