Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: GDB on SGI Irix 6.5
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 06:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3405-Thu19Apr2001160546+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010418192856.456A-100000@is>

> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:31:42 +0300 (IDT)
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
> 
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, I've this sinking feeling that, prior to me adding the assert() it
> > was falling off the end of the regcache and just blatting memory :-/
> > 
> > 72, I've this feeling that it is the ``FP'':
> > 
> > ac131313@localhost$ grep 72 config/mips/tm-*
> > config/mips/tm-mips.h:#define FP_REGNUM 72              /* Pseudo
> > register that contains true address of executing stack frame */
> > 
> > As a quick hack, pump up NUM_PSEUDO_REGS to make space for this (and
> > possibly a few more).
> 
> Thanks for the hint.
> 
> However, this doesn't work: it again bumps into internal_error because 
> there's no gdbarch method for fetching pseudo registers.  How would such 
> a method look for a target that doesn't have a frame pointer?
> 
> Also, strangely enough, tm-irix3.h does define a place for FP in the 
> registers array (at index 30).  So why doesn't it define FP_REGNUM 
> accordingly?

I think I've got it: tm-irix3.h is simply wrong for either Irix 6.5 or
the N32 ABI and the MIPS CPUs that support it (or both).  Not only
should FP_REGNUM be set to 30, but the enumeration and the total
number of registers defined on tm-irix3.h is incorrect for the SGI
machine I have here.

tm-mips.h, which defines FP_REGNUM to 72, is also wrong for Irix, at
least for Irix 6.5 with N32 executables.  I have no idea how could
this possibly work for anyone in the past.

I have a provisional patch which seems to DTRT for me.  But to clean
it up (so that I can submit it without blushing ;-), I need help in
making several decisions, since I have no prior experience with, or
knowledge about, the different CPUs and ABIs supported by SGI Irix.

Questions:

  - Should I make the change in tm-irix5.h, or should I leave it alone
    and create irix6x.h?  The issue here is that perhaps Irix 5 did
    work like tm-irix5.h says, and I won't want to break that.

  - What should I do about the different ABIs?  At least 3 come to
    mind: O32, N32, and N64.  They have subtly different layouts of
    registers, so if I need to set things up for more than a single
    ABI, I'll need to know what's the current say-so about how this
    should be done (e.g., does gdbarch has some functionality for
    dynamically computing the registers array?).

Thanks in advance for any help.


  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-19  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-09  0:08 Eli Zaretskii
2001-04-09  6:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-17 10:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-04-18  9:29   ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-04-19  6:08     ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2001-04-30 10:01       ` Andrew Cagney
2001-04-30 11:28         ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-04-19 18:06 David B Anderson
2001-04-21 11:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-04-21 12:09   ` Paul Hilfinger
2001-04-21 13:09 ` David B Anderson
2001-04-21 13:19   ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-17  8:58   ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-17  9:15     ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-17  9:26       ` Daniel Berlin
2001-05-17  9:28         ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-17  9:41           ` Daniel Berlin
2001-05-17 11:33             ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-17 11:47               ` Daniel Berlin
2001-05-17 10:15 David B Anderson
2001-05-17 11:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-13  1:53 Eli Zaretskii
     [not found] <200106131650.JAA27856@quasar.engr.sgi.com>
2001-06-13 11:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-13 13:05   ` Andrew Cagney
     [not found] <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010612152328.3699B-100000@is>
     [not found] ` <3B266F35.50007@cygnus.com>
     [not found]   ` <15142.30117.72465.686304@kwikemart.cygnus.com>
2001-06-13  1:55     ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-13 13:35     ` David B Anderson
2001-06-13 21:19       ` Daniel Berlin
     [not found] <npae3c16ia.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
2001-06-14  0:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-14 10:05   ` Daniel Berlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3405-Thu19Apr2001160546+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox