Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Paul_Koning@Dell.com>
To: <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Cc: <omeragacan@gmail.com>, <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: recursion limit exceeded in Python API, but there's only one function in traceback
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2BD7D737-CFF3-4368-9265-25C6611CF40C@dell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5440EB39.2060305@redhat.com>


On Oct 17, 2014, at 6:11 AM, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com> wrote:

> ...
> Right.  gdb.execute won't return until the command has completed.
> Also the Python GIL has been acquired (as this is coming from the
> Python interpreter) and so now Python is also blocked too.  So in
> effect the only thing running at this point is the gdb.execute command
> that was invoked (in your case, the continue command). That will
> return, and then the Python GIL will be released and the rest of the
> script will continue.
> 
> I have a patch I need to upstream that adds a release_gil keyword to
> gdb.execute.  This optionally releases the GIL before executing the
> command.  But I have not got around to that yet.

Could you explain why gdb.execute should ever hold onto the GIL while performing the command?  I view gdb.execute as akin to an I/O operation, which releases the GIL around the I/O.  Another way to look at it is that execute is performing a GDB command.  Either that isn’t a Python operation — in which case the GIL is not needed since the data it protects won’t be touched.  Or it is a command that (possibly indirectly) invokes another Python operation — in which case the GIL has to be released or you end up with a deadlock.

What am I missing?

	paul


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-17 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-16 10:46 Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-16 12:45 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-16 14:28   ` Paul_Koning
     [not found]     ` <CAMQQO3=GxjGzF-9RXQsJ_9=Du3rS-UoYFA_0-friPp1nMa8yAA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-16 15:04       ` Paul_Koning
2014-10-16 15:15         ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-16 15:18         ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-17  9:31           ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-17 10:11             ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 10:53               ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-17 14:20                 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 14:27                   ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-17 15:02                     ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 15:04               ` Paul_Koning [this message]
2014-10-17 17:31                 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 16:41             ` Doug Evans
2014-10-17 17:35               ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 16:45           ` Doug Evans
     [not found]     ` <543FE072.6040507@redhat.com>
2014-10-16 15:16       ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2BD7D737-CFF3-4368-9265-25C6611CF40C@dell.com \
    --to=paul_koning@dell.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=omeragacan@gmail.com \
    --cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox