From: <Paul_Koning@Dell.com>
To: <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Cc: <omeragacan@gmail.com>, <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: recursion limit exceeded in Python API, but there's only one function in traceback
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <104DEFBD-D686-4290-8E3C-725A51C165E6@dell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <543FBDFF.3050709@redhat.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1266 bytes --]
On Oct 16, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 16/10/14 11:45, Ãmer Sinan AÄacan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm putting some breakpoints and then running some actions when
>> program reaches that points, using Python API.
>>
>> After a few breaks, GDB is starting to print these lines:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/home/omer/gdb_script/script.py", line 71, in handle_breakpoint
>> self.breakpoint_jump_addrs[bp.location].add(addr)
>> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
>
> That's an error from Python. It tells me something in script.py is
> not quite right. Impossible to tell without seeing script.py in
> general. You can increase the recursion depth by doing something like
>
> import sys
> sys.setrecursionlimit(9000)
>
> Where '9000' is a limit you can set and vary. However, this might
> indeed be papering over the cracks, and not fixing the fault.
I would expect that you could wrap the script in a try/except block, to catch the stack overflow and print a Python stack trace when that happens.
Should GDB print a Python backtrace when the Python script fails, just as executing a Python script standalone would do?
paul
\x16º&ÖëzÛ«ûóÉb²Ö«r\x18\x1d
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-16 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-16 10:46 Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-16 12:45 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-16 14:28 ` Paul_Koning [this message]
[not found] ` <CAMQQO3=GxjGzF-9RXQsJ_9=Du3rS-UoYFA_0-friPp1nMa8yAA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-16 15:04 ` Paul_Koning
2014-10-16 15:15 ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-16 15:18 ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-17 9:31 ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-17 10:11 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 10:53 ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-17 14:20 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 14:27 ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2014-10-17 15:02 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 15:04 ` Paul_Koning
2014-10-17 17:31 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 16:41 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-17 17:35 ` Phil Muldoon
2014-10-17 16:45 ` Doug Evans
[not found] ` <543FE072.6040507@redhat.com>
2014-10-16 15:16 ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=104DEFBD-D686-4290-8E3C-725A51C165E6@dell.com \
--to=paul_koning@dell.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=omeragacan@gmail.com \
--cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox