Re: x86_64-elf gdb

[Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1562 bytes --]

On Tue, 2015-03-31 04:46:01 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-30 15:59:49 -0500, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com> wrote:
> > On 3/30/2015 3:54 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > > It built for me. But I don't have any way to test it.  Is that
> > > > enough to submit a patch for the elf stanza addition?
> > > That seems odd to me.  What would be the advantage of pushing that
> > > patch if it's a configuration that you can't test?
> >
> > At the moment, x86_64-elf doesn't even build for binutils-gdb. It
> > fails due to a missing gdb configuration.
> > 
> > And if binutils-gdb doesn't complete successfully, that means gcc
> > can't be built for this target.
> > 
> > Jan.. do you build binutils-gdb and gcc for this target?
> 
> I didn't build it until a minute ago, just x86_64-linux was on the
> list. It's added now, so let's wait for the first build to take place
> and see how well that works.

...and here's the very first x86_64-elf build:

	http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=433054


Pure Binutils (without GDB) und GCC worked fine so far, but GDB
didn't, as expected:

make all-gdb
[...]
configure: error: configuration x86_64-pc-elf is unsupported.
make: *** [configure-gdb] Error 1

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@lug-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:             God put me on earth to accomplish a certain number of
the second  :            things. Right now I am so far behind I will never die.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]