On Tue, 2015-03-31 04:46:01 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-30 15:59:49 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On 3/30/2015 3:54 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > > It built for me. But I don't have any way to test it. Is that > > > > enough to submit a patch for the elf stanza addition? > > > That seems odd to me. What would be the advantage of pushing that > > > patch if it's a configuration that you can't test? > > > > At the moment, x86_64-elf doesn't even build for binutils-gdb. It > > fails due to a missing gdb configuration. > > > > And if binutils-gdb doesn't complete successfully, that means gcc > > can't be built for this target. > > > > Jan.. do you build binutils-gdb and gcc for this target? > > I didn't build it until a minute ago, just x86_64-linux was on the > list. It's added now, so let's wait for the first build to take place > and see how well that works. ...and here's the very first x86_64-elf build: http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=433054 Pure Binutils (without GDB) und GCC worked fine so far, but GDB didn't, as expected: make all-gdb [...] configure: error: configuration x86_64-pc-elf is unsupported. make: *** [configure-gdb] Error 1 MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: God put me on earth to accomplish a certain number of the second : things. Right now I am so far behind I will never die.