Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* sim vs c99
@ 2015-02-19 14:06 DJ Delorie
  2015-02-19 16:02 ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2015-02-19 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb


clang defaults to c99 and gcc is moving towards it.

The simulator won't build with -std=c99, lots of these due to "extern
inline" using the c89 semantics:

libsim.a(sim-core.o): In function `sim_addr_range_hit_p':
binutils-gdb/sim/msp430/../common/sim-arange.c:290: multiple definition of `sim_addr_range_hit_p'
nrun.o:binutils-gdb/sim/msp430/../common/sim-arange.c:290: first defined here

Are there any plans to switch to C99 or at least detect/support a C99
environment?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-19 16:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-19 14:06 sim vs c99 DJ Delorie
2015-02-19 16:02 ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox