From: "André Pönitz" <andre.poenitz@nokia.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Getting pissed off by gdb. Please help with stepping in.
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003181554.44152.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100318143917.GA15423@caradoc.them.org>
On Thursday 18 March 2010 15:39:23 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:33:05PM +0100, André Pönitz wrote:
> > I used the term from the comment
> >
> > "Optimize by setting the stepping range to the line."
>
> Oh, I see - that's the comment below, not the one quoted. OK.
>
> > For me it's in fact the opposite to an optimization as the single stepping
> > through the rest of the second line leads to one round trip through the
> > stub for each of the remaining instructions which easily sums up to a
> > couple of seconds for lines that generate a hundred instructions.
>
> Just what are you disabling then? I thought it was the if block you
> quoted, not the step range changes.
I am unconditionally executing
if (1) {
/* ... */
if (debug_infrun)
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: stepped to a different line\n");
ecs->event_thread->stop_step = 1;
print_stop_reason (END_STEPPING_RANGE, 0);
stop_stepping (ecs);
return;
}
This means the PC might indeed end up in the middle of a line, and a few
instruction of this line have already been executed. However in these
somewhat "special" circumstances this is a significantly lesser evil then
skipping a whole line (and taking several seconds for that ;-})
Andre'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-18 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 2:39 temp
2010-03-18 3:00 ` Hui Zhu
2010-03-18 3:03 ` Nathan Froyd
2010-03-18 7:22 ` Doug Evans
2010-03-18 9:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-18 15:10 ` Doug Evans
2010-03-18 15:21 ` Pedro Alves
2010-03-18 18:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-18 18:55 ` Pedro Alves
2010-03-18 19:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-18 19:54 ` Mark Kettenis
2010-03-18 20:43 ` Doug Evans
2010-03-18 20:51 ` Michael Snyder
2010-03-18 21:17 ` Pedro Alves
2010-03-18 21:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-18 23:37 ` Paul Hilfinger
2010-03-19 9:51 ` Richard Earnshaw
2010-03-19 10:41 ` Mark Kettenis
2010-03-19 13:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-19 10:19 ` André Pönitz
2010-03-18 15:28 ` Doug Evans
2010-03-18 18:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-03-18 18:37 ` Paul Koning
2010-03-18 19:06 ` Doug Evans
2010-03-18 20:48 ` Jonas Maebe
2010-03-18 13:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-03-18 14:06 ` André Pönitz
2010-03-18 14:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-03-18 14:33 ` André Pönitz
2010-03-18 14:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-03-18 14:54 ` André Pönitz [this message]
2010-03-18 15:40 ` Doug Evans
2010-03-18 17:41 ` Michael Snyder
2010-03-18 22:44 ` temp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003181554.44152.andre.poenitz@nokia.com \
--to=andre.poenitz@nokia.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox