From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@redhat.com,
ralf.corsepius@rtems.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091002183756.GA23588@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910021823.n92INVuX003644@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:23:31 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I think that would be a bad idea since size_t will be a 64-bit type on
> 64-bit hosts. This will increase memory usage on 6-bit hosts.
We do need 64-bit target TYPE_LENGTH support. There exist >2GB debuginfos:
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/gdb/devel/gdb-6.3-bz231832-obstack-2gb.patch?view=co
and I guess some HPC (High Performance Computing) is already exceeding it for
runtime data object size. With dynamic data type sizes
(archer-jankratochvil-vla) such current dynamic size is stored in TYPE_LENGTH.
Just it should not be size_t but target_size_t. Yes, it should be CORE_ADDR.
Regards,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 20:48 Joel Brobecker
2009-10-01 3:17 ` Ralf Corsepius
2009-10-01 8:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-01 9:35 ` Pierre Muller
2009-10-01 9:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-10-01 12:11 ` Ralf Corsepius
2009-10-01 13:10 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-10-02 15:40 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-02 17:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-10-01 10:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-10-01 11:20 ` Ralf Corsepius
2009-10-01 18:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-02 2:46 ` Ralf Corsepius
2009-10-02 15:39 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-02 17:28 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-10-01 17:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-01 17:21 ` Ralf Corsepius
2009-10-01 17:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-10-01 18:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-01 18:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-10-01 20:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-10-01 18:40 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2009-10-01 18:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-02 15:48 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-02 16:57 ` Ralf Corsepius
2009-10-02 17:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-02 18:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-10-02 18:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-02 18:24 ` Mark Kettenis
2009-10-02 18:38 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2009-10-02 21:46 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-02 22:00 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-10-02 15:35 ` Tom Tromey
2009-10-01 12:02 ` Pierre Muller
2009-10-01 17:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-01 21:22 ` [RFA] more fixes to testsuite (was RE: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing) Pierre Muller
2009-10-01 21:28 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091002183756.GA23588@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=ralf.corsepius@rtems.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox