From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: Regression
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090211154956.GA21635@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902101927.45089.pedro@codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 07:27:44PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 February 2009 19:18:12, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > We don't see the problem on linux, since there's a stop and
> > resume *right at the begining* of the signal handler, due to the
> > single-step entering the signal handler. Â GDB happens
> > to re-install breakpoints in the inferior in that resume. Â This
> > happens *before* the inferior's flow passing by the instruction
> > where there's a breakpoint at ("break handle_USR1" is installed
> > after the prologue).
>
> I'm thinking that this regression is also happening on linux
> archs that rely on software single-stepping, but I haven't
> checked it.
We run automatic periodic testing and arm-linux is one of the covered
platforms - apologies for not having the GDB test results posted
anywhere, we do send out GCC logs.
Unfortunately annota1.exp does not run for cross testing, probably
because it relies on mixed GDB and inferior output. And a binutils
bug caused the results to be garbage for a couple of months. Which
means that I have before results, but not after; I'll keep an eye out
for the next batch.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 15:17 Regression Mark Kettenis
2009-02-10 15:27 ` Regression Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-02-10 15:47 ` Regression Mark Kettenis
2009-02-10 16:06 ` Regression Pedro Alves
2009-02-10 16:18 ` Regression Tristan Gingold
2009-02-10 18:00 ` Regression Pedro Alves
2009-02-10 18:40 ` Regression Mark Kettenis
2009-02-10 19:05 ` Regression Pedro Alves
2009-02-10 19:18 ` Regression Pedro Alves
2009-02-10 19:27 ` Regression Pedro Alves
2009-02-11 15:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-10 15:14 Regression Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090211154956.GA21635@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox