Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@st.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Robustify frame_unwind_address_in_block heuristic?
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081001144756.GA19452@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1222872102.6785.516.camel@crx3051.cro.st.com>

On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:41:42PM +0200, Frederic RISS wrote:
> I have to admit that the above is a convoluted case which shouldn't show
> up in a 'standard' debug session. It's also not the first time I wish
> that frame unwinders were more flexible/modular, but it's the first time
> that I wasn't able to work around the issue without patching GDB's core
> functionality. Would it be acceptable to add a check to the above
> function that checks whether pc-1 points into the same function as pc?

No.  That's exactly the issue this code was written to handle :-)

> Or maybe someone sees another way to prevent that issue?

I don't see how to generically handle this case unless you can
distinguish it from this example:

my_function:
	do_stuff
	call noreturn_function
unrelated_function:
	do_unrelated_stuff

But there's rarely anything to handle the special kind of call in your
'returned-to' function, so from what's on the stack, I don't know how
we can tell.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-01 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-01 14:42 Frederic RISS
2008-10-01 14:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-10-01 15:26   ` Frederic RISS
2008-10-01 15:29   ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-01 15:58     ` Frederic RISS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081001144756.GA19452@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=frederic.riss@st.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox