Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Rossi <bob_rossi@cox.net>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Posting from work/university addresses
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070805015814.GC21125@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070805000658.GA29704@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:06:58PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 04:04:23PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 11:32:44AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >>I know you are just trying to be really precise about what is
> >>happening, but, honestly, don't worry: we're free software volunteers
> >>just like you.  We're on your side.  We won't do anything dumb.
> >
> >I think Eli has a very good point in this matter.  It is very easy for
> >a group of talented people to say "trust us, we are doing the correct
> >thing".  However, over time, the people change, and other motivating
> >factors can creep in.  I agree its best to keep all policy about this
> >matter open.  If everyone is doing the right thing, then there is
> >absolutely nothing to hide, right?  or perhaps you are afraid that if
> >the spammers know what you are blocking, then they will get good at
> >spamming...
> 
> I believe that Ian pointed you to web pages which talk about the spam
> blocking.  Here's one in particular:
> 
> http://sourceware.org/lists.html#spam
> 
> The vast majority of email received at sourceware.org is spam.  We have
> obviously been blocking it for quite some time.  We also have blocked
> certain individuals who have abused the privilege of sending email to
> the mailing lists.
> 
> Remember that you know that the disclaimer block is happening because I
> mentioned it.  Suggesting that there may be other motivations for the
> action, that we may be too stupid to do the right thing, that we may
> become untrustworthy over time, or chiding us to be open really seems
> like a pointless exercise to me.

Sure, whatever you say.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-05  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-30  8:14 Why does gdb implement 'next' command with a series of "vCont;s"? congli
2007-07-30 22:12 ` Posting from work/university addresses Jim Blandy
2007-07-31  0:08   ` Anmol P. Paralkar
2007-07-31  1:08     ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-02 16:58       ` Robin Getz
2007-08-02 17:12         ` Robert Dewar
2007-08-02 17:42           ` Robin Getz
2007-08-02 18:09             ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-04 17:36             ` Eric Weddington
2007-08-02 18:23           ` Jim Blandy
2007-08-02 18:34             ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-03 12:05               ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-03 14:27                 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-03 14:39                 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-03 17:10                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-03 23:11                     ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-04  8:41                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-04 18:36                         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-04 18:51                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-05  0:03                             ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-05  3:51                               ` Robin Getz
2007-08-05  5:07                                 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-05 12:03                                   ` Robert Dewar
2007-08-05 18:27                                     ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-06  6:53                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-06 14:04                             ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-06 14:22                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-04 20:04                           ` Bob Rossi
2007-08-05  0:06                             ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-05  1:58                               ` Bob Rossi [this message]
2007-08-05  3:13                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-05  4:33                                 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-06 14:07                             ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-07-31  7:59   ` Wenbo Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070805015814.GC21125@cox.net \
    --to=bob_rossi@cox.net \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox