Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew J Fletcher <mfletcher@serck-controls.co.uk>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>, "Stewart, Richard"  <rstewart@mc.com>
Subject: Re: GDB 4.18 with GCC 3.3.6
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200507081536.52039.mfletcher@serck-controls.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42CE80AA.7040508@kegel.com>

On Friday 08 Jul 2005 2:33 pm, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Stewart, Richard wrote:
> > I would like to use GDB 4.18 with GCC 3.3.6 and possibly even newer
> > versions of GCC.  I'm using GCC 2.95 right now and would like to gain
> > some of the performance improvements in the newer versions of the
> > compiler
>
> Um, better be sure there really are performance improvements
> before you dive in.  One app that I care about runs slower
> on gcc-3.4.1 than on gcc-2.95.3.
>
> I'm putting together a performance regression benchmark
> suite right now by pulling together all the known microbenchmarks
> that run slower on newer versions of gcc, in hopes
> of helping make sure that gcc-4.1 resolves most of them.
> - Dan

i would be very interested in your preliminary results if you have any.

maybe your going to test 2.95.3 / 3.3.6 / 3.4.4 / 4.0.1  / 4.1.x with C based 
benchmarks, but i would be also very intrested in complex C++ (using stl 
features) for the same set of compilers, as my 'embedded' application is 
written in complex c++.


regards
---
Matthew J Fletcher
Embedded Software
Serck Controls Ltd
---
**********************************************************************
Serck Controls Ltd, Rowley Drive, Coventry, CV3 4FH, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 24 7630 5050   Fax: +44 (0) 24 7630 2437
Web: www.serck-controls.com  Admin: post@serck-controls.co.uk
A subsidiary of Serck Controls Pty. Ltd. Reg. in England No. 4353634
**********************************************************************
This email and files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the above. Any views or opinions presented are those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Serck Controls Ltd.


This message has been checked by MessageLabs
******************************************************************


  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-08 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-08 12:08 Stewart, Richard
2005-07-08 13:42 ` Dan Kegel
2005-07-08 14:33   ` Matthew J Fletcher [this message]
2005-07-08 14:50     ` Dan Kegel
2005-07-08 13:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-08 19:02 ` Jason Molenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200507081536.52039.mfletcher@serck-controls.co.uk \
    --to=mfletcher@serck-controls.co.uk \
    --cc=dank@kegel.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rstewart@mc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox