From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15222 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2005 14:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14651 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2005 14:33:15 -0000 Received: from mail9.messagelabs.com (HELO mail9.messagelabs.com) (194.205.110.133) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with SMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:33:15 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: mfletcher@serck-controls.co.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-20.tower-9.messagelabs.com!1120833192!21390937!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.4.15; banners=serck-controls.co.uk,-,- Received: (qmail 4006 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2005 14:33:12 -0000 Received: from mail.serck-controls.co.uk (HELO serck-controls.co.uk) (213.38.169.170) by server-20.tower-9.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2005 14:33:12 -0000 Received: from 10.1.20.21 by serck-controls.co.uk ([10.1.2.102] running VPOP3) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 15:33:12 +0100 From: Matthew J Fletcher Reply-To: mfletcher@serck-controls.co.uk To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 4.18 with GCC 3.3.6 Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:33:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Dan Kegel , "Stewart, Richard" References: <190C93606B0ADD40B7968DAFAA3E192867EB0E@ad-email1.ad.mc.com> <42CE80AA.7040508@kegel.com> In-Reply-To: <42CE80AA.7040508@kegel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507081536.52039.mfletcher@serck-controls.co.uk> X-Authenticated-Sender: mfletcher@serck-controls.co.uk X-Server: VPOP3 Enterprise V2.0.0k - Registered X-Organisation: Serck Controls Ltd X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 On Friday 08 Jul 2005 2:33 pm, Dan Kegel wrote: > Stewart, Richard wrote: > > I would like to use GDB 4.18 with GCC 3.3.6 and possibly even newer > > versions of GCC. I'm using GCC 2.95 right now and would like to gain > > some of the performance improvements in the newer versions of the > > compiler > > Um, better be sure there really are performance improvements > before you dive in. One app that I care about runs slower > on gcc-3.4.1 than on gcc-2.95.3. > > I'm putting together a performance regression benchmark > suite right now by pulling together all the known microbenchmarks > that run slower on newer versions of gcc, in hopes > of helping make sure that gcc-4.1 resolves most of them. > - Dan i would be very interested in your preliminary results if you have any. maybe your going to test 2.95.3 / 3.3.6 / 3.4.4 / 4.0.1 / 4.1.x with C based benchmarks, but i would be also very intrested in complex C++ (using stl features) for the same set of compilers, as my 'embedded' application is written in complex c++. regards --- Matthew J Fletcher Embedded Software Serck Controls Ltd --- ********************************************************************** Serck Controls Ltd, Rowley Drive, Coventry, CV3 4FH, UK Tel: +44 (0) 24 7630 5050 Fax: +44 (0) 24 7630 2437 Web: www.serck-controls.com Admin: post@serck-controls.co.uk A subsidiary of Serck Controls Pty. Ltd. Reg. in England No. 4353634 ********************************************************************** This email and files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the above. Any views or opinions presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Serck Controls Ltd. This message has been checked by MessageLabs ******************************************************************