Re: branch comparison tables

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:38:54PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote:
> > By the way, FYI: At this moment, the FAILs (only, not looking at the
> > kfails at the moment) for GCC 3.4 and GCC HEAD are in several
> > categories:
> 
> Well, that's what "compare by gcc" is for.
> 
> In this set of tables:
> 
>   http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2004-01-19-branch
> 
> Here are the files that have a regression from gcc 3.3.2 to gcc
> gcc-3_4-branch or a regression from gcc 3.3.2 to gcc HEAD,
> with either gdb 6.0 or gdb HEAD:
> 
>   gdb.base/break.exp
>   gdb.base/scope.exp
>   gdb.base/sepdebug.exp
>   gdb.base/store.exp
>   gdb.cp/anon-union.exp
>   gdb.cp/classes.exp
>   gdb.cp/local.exp
>   gdb.cp/namespace.exp
>   gdb.java/jmisc1.exp
>   gdb.java/jmisc2.exp
>   gdb.mi/mi-until.exp
>   gdb.mi/mi-var-block.exp
>   gdb.mi/mi1-until.exp
>   gdb.mi/mi1-var-block.exp
>   gdb.mi/mi2-until.exp
>   gdb.mi/mi2-var-block.exp
>   gdb.threads/tls.exp
> 
> > I believe that no more of them are caused by GCC.
> 
> PR gcc/12267 is still causing stabs problems.

Sorry, I forgot to mention above - I only did DWARF2.

> gdb.cp/anon-union.exp is blowing up, I haven't analyzed it yet.

It's a legitimate change in the debug output that GDB is not prepared
for.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer