Re: branch comparison tables

[mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)]

> By the way, FYI: At this moment, the FAILs (only, not looking at the
> kfails at the moment) for GCC 3.4 and GCC HEAD are in several
> categories:

Well, that's what "compare by gcc" is for.

In this set of tables:

  http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2004-01-19-branch

Here are the files that have a regression from gcc 3.3.2 to gcc
gcc-3_4-branch or a regression from gcc 3.3.2 to gcc HEAD,
with either gdb 6.0 or gdb HEAD:

  gdb.base/break.exp
  gdb.base/scope.exp
  gdb.base/sepdebug.exp
  gdb.base/store.exp
  gdb.cp/anon-union.exp
  gdb.cp/classes.exp
  gdb.cp/local.exp
  gdb.cp/namespace.exp
  gdb.java/jmisc1.exp
  gdb.java/jmisc2.exp
  gdb.mi/mi-until.exp
  gdb.mi/mi-var-block.exp
  gdb.mi/mi1-until.exp
  gdb.mi/mi1-var-block.exp
  gdb.mi/mi2-until.exp
  gdb.mi/mi2-var-block.exp
  gdb.threads/tls.exp

> I believe that no more of them are caused by GCC.

PR gcc/12267 is still causing stabs problems.
gdb.cp/anon-union.exp is blowing up, I haven't analyzed it yet.

> The multi_line_while_statement failures in your tables were, but I
> checked in a fix this morning.

That will show up in my next spin, 36-48 hours from now.

Michael C