From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
Josef Zlomek <zlomj9am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problem with location lists and variables on stack
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031007214832.GA11708@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1BEF617C-F80C-11D7-8E4F-000A95AF1FAE@dberlin.org>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:48:12AM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >>Daniel Berlin has already written support for GCC to generate location
> >>list for DW_AT_frame_base.
> >>DW_AT_frame_base is a location list as any other (actually only the
> >>offsets relatively to original stack pointer at function start are
> >>needed).
> >>GDB then uses this location list to adjust offsets of other variables
> >>addressed using stack pointer.
> >>With Daniel Jacobowitz's fix for GDB it works :-)
> >>i.e. you can see correct values for variables located on stack
> >>even when stack pointer changes because of push, pop, etc.
> >>
> >>Current GCC patch can be downloaded from:
> >>http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~zlomj9am/download/vt-main.patch
> >>
> >>(because currently GCC is in stage 2 it has to wait until GCC is in
> >>stage 1)
> >
> >I suppose this is true, but it's really unfortunate.
>
> I'm not so sure it's true.
>
> This isn't a major change, really and it's only going to make things
> better (We didn't use to support -O2 -g at all, really, and now we can.
> There can't be any regressions from an unsupported state to a
> supported one). It's also not an optimization pass, so the risk is
> relatively low.
Well, FWIW I'd like to see this included. Josef, do you have any
interest in submiting it for 3.4, to see what reaction it gets at least?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-07 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-01 14:43 Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 14:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 15:21 ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 15:44 ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 15:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 16:03 ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 16:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 17:41 ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 17:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 17:48 ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-06 6:22 ` Richard Henderson
2003-10-06 6:40 ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-06 13:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-06 14:49 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-10-07 21:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-10-08 5:09 ` Josef Zlomek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031007214832.GA11708@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=zlomj9am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox