Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com,
	Josef Zlomek <zlomj9am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: Problem with location lists and variables on stack
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 14:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1BEF617C-F80C-11D7-8E4F-000A95AF1FAE@dberlin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031006134604.GA31005@nevyn.them.org>

>> Daniel Berlin has already written support for GCC to generate location
>> list for DW_AT_frame_base.
>> DW_AT_frame_base is a location list as any other (actually only the
>> offsets relatively to original stack pointer at function start are 
>> needed).
>> GDB then uses this location list to adjust offsets of other variables
>> addressed using stack pointer.
>> With Daniel Jacobowitz's fix for GDB it works :-)
>> i.e. you can see correct values for variables located on stack
>> even when stack pointer changes because of push, pop, etc.
>>
>> Current GCC patch can be downloaded from:
>> http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~zlomj9am/download/vt-main.patch
>>
>> (because currently GCC is in stage 2 it has to wait until GCC is in 
>> stage 1)
>
> I suppose this is true, but it's really unfortunate.

I'm not so sure it's true.

This isn't a major change, really and it's only going to make things 
better (We didn't use to support -O2 -g at all, really, and now we can. 
  There can't be any regressions from an unsupported state to a 
supported one).  It's also not an optimization pass, so the risk is 
relatively low.

>
> -- 
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-06 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-01 14:43 Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 14:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 15:21   ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 15:44   ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 15:54     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 16:03       ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 16:22         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 17:41           ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-01 17:44             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 17:48               ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-06  6:22               ` Richard Henderson
2003-10-06  6:40                 ` Josef Zlomek
2003-10-06 13:46                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-06 14:49                     ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
2003-10-07 21:48                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-08  5:09                         ` Josef Zlomek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1BEF617C-F80C-11D7-8E4F-000A95AF1FAE@dberlin.org \
    --to=dberlin@dberlin.org \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    --cc=zlomj9am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox