From: DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com>
To: ian@airs.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: FYI: A new C++ demangler
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307152005.h6FK5NtA029061@envy.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3n0ffmwi0.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> (message from Ian Lance Taylor on 15 Jul 2003 12:16:07 -0700)
> Also, who exactly is demanding to continue a broken implementation?
It's not that we're demanding that we use a broken implementation.
It's just that, so far, HJ's "new" implementation hasn't been
acceptable to replace libiberty's current one, and nobody has fixed
libiberty's implementation.
> It really can not be all that difficult to fix the current demangler.
Actually, the bug is a bit more fundamental that you'd think - it has
to do with qualifiers on class method pointers, at least. But as I
mentioned before, I'm working on it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-15 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-12 18:02 Nathanael Nerode
2003-07-15 16:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-15 18:03 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-07-15 19:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-15 19:03 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-07-15 19:16 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-15 19:49 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-07-15 19:55 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-15 22:30 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-07-15 23:14 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-16 2:31 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-07-16 3:21 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-07-16 17:12 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-07-15 19:16 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-07-15 19:23 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-15 20:05 ` DJ Delorie [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-11 0:36 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-10 21:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-10 15:42 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-10 15:51 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-10 16:38 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-07-10 14:36 H. J. Lu
2003-07-10 14:40 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-07-10 14:54 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-10 15:28 ` David Carlton
2003-07-10 15:36 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-10 15:44 ` David Carlton
2003-07-10 20:57 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-07-10 21:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-10 21:44 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-10 22:58 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2003-07-10 23:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-10 21:22 ` DJ Delorie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307152005.h6FK5NtA029061@envy.delorie.com \
--to=dj@delorie.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ian@airs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox