From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21942 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2003 20:05:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21875 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2003 20:05:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2003 20:05:31 -0000 Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171]) by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id h6FK5OZ02006; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:05:24 -0400 Received: from envy.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by envy.delorie.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6FK5OVJ029065; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:05:24 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by envy.delorie.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6FK5NtA029061; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:05:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200307152005.h6FK5NtA029061@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: ian@airs.com CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Ian Lance Taylor on 15 Jul 2003 12:16:07 -0700) Subject: Re: FYI: A new C++ demangler References: <20030712180228.GA912@doctormoo> <3F142933.1060902@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 > Also, who exactly is demanding to continue a broken implementation? It's not that we're demanding that we use a broken implementation. It's just that, so far, HJ's "new" implementation hasn't been acceptable to replace libiberty's current one, and nobody has fixed libiberty's implementation. > It really can not be all that difficult to fix the current demangler. Actually, the bug is a bit more fundamental that you'd think - it has to do with qualifiers on class method pointers, at least. But as I mentioned before, I'm working on it.