From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Kris Warkentin <kewarken@qnx.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB honouring RPATH in binaries.
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030220194049.GA19653@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1030220193301.ZM10611@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:33:01PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2:15pm, Kris Warkentin wrote:
>
> > I've been having a debate with some coworkers about whether or not gdb
> > should use the rpath in an elf binary to find shared libs if it has been
> > set. The runtime loader checks LD_LIBRARY_PATH, RPATH and CS_LIBPATH in
> > that order and the proposal was that gdb should do the same thing.
> >
> > The problem I have with this is in the remote case. This might make perfect
> > sense on a self-hosted debugger but if targetting a remote machine, the
> > RPATH might not make any logical mapping onto the host machine's filesystem.
> > It might be possible to come up with some sort of heuristic using
> > solib-absolute-prefix as a base but I don't think there's any reliable way
> > to make use of this info if not self hosted.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> The other problem that I see is that the procedures used to resolve
> the location of a dynamic library will vary depending upon the runtime
> loader. E.g, on Linux, I am pretty sure that RPATH supercedes
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
> It may make sense to have a osabi dependent method for doing this
> resolution. Or maybe this machinery should be tied to the solib
> back end. (That way if you had a qnx back end, it would get used
> automatically.)
>
> With regard to the remote case, I would have thought that simply
> prepending solib-absolute-prefix would give the correct results.
Question: when do we need to find shared libraries that we can't use a
full path + solib-absolute-prefix, where RPATH would be in the least
useful? RPATH only matters when you have multiple places you could
find the library and are interested in which one you got; if there is a
mapping between target and host filesystems, it should be
solib-absolute-prefix only.
We generally get full pathnames of loaded modules from the dynamic
linker, and use that. Is this a problem for QNX?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-20 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-20 19:15 Kris Warkentin
2003-02-20 19:33 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-20 19:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-02-20 19:44 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-20 19:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-20 19:54 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-20 19:58 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-20 20:00 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-20 20:01 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-20 20:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-20 20:12 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-20 20:04 ` Paul Koning
2003-02-20 20:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-21 15:32 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-21 18:28 ` [Proposal] " Kris Warkentin
2003-02-21 18:30 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-21 18:32 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-21 19:14 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-21 19:18 ` Colin Burgess
2003-02-21 19:42 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-21 19:46 ` Colin Burgess
2003-02-21 19:55 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-21 20:27 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-21 21:02 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-21 21:04 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-20 20:18 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-20 20:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-20 19:50 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-20 19:41 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-20 19:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-20 19:59 ` Kris Warkentin
2003-02-20 20:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-20 19:48 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-20 19:52 ` Kris Warkentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030220194049.GA19653@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=kewarken@qnx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox