Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARM stack alignment on hand called functions
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200211201837.gAKIbXv25319@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:26:28 EST." <191601c290b1$942159e0$0202040a@catdog>

> The problem arises only with functions which return structures whose size is
> not evenly divisible by 4.  Below is what I did to solve it.
> 
> Index: arm-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /product/tools/gdb/gdb/arm-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.9
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -c -r1.9 -r1.10
> *** arm-tdep.c  20 Sep 2002 17:11:31 -0000      1.9
> --- arm-tdep.c  19 Nov 2002 18:33:37 -0000      1.10
> ***************
> *** 1480,1485 ****
> --- 1480,1486 ----
>         }
>       }
> 
> +   sp = (sp + 3) & ~3;
>     /* Return adjusted stack pointer.  */
>     return sp;
>   }
> 

OK, but with this change the alignment is being done *after* any arguments 
that have to go onto the stack have been pushed.  It should happen 
*before*.  What happens if you have?

struct f { char a; char b; char c;};

struct f g = {1,2,3};

struct f h (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e)
{
  g.c = e;
  return g;
}

and then call h from within the debugger.  Is g.c set correctly?

My guess is that it won't, because the integer value for e will have been 
pushed onto the stack incorrectly.

R.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-20 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-20  7:29 Kris Warkentin
2002-11-20  7:58 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-11-20  8:10   ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-20  8:21     ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-11-20  8:26       ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-20  9:18         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-20  9:35           ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-26 14:01             ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-27  1:18               ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-11-20 10:37         ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2002-11-20 10:59           ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-20 11:40             ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-21  2:58               ` Richard Earnshaw
     [not found] <200211272021.PAA04606@hub.ott.qnx.com>
2002-11-27 13:13 ` Kris Warkentin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200211201837.gAKIbXv25319@pc960.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=rearnsha@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kewarken@qnx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox