From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken@qnx.com>
Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARM stack alignment on hand called functions
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200211201837.gAKIbXv25319@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:26:28 EST." <191601c290b1$942159e0$0202040a@catdog>
> The problem arises only with functions which return structures whose size is
> not evenly divisible by 4. Below is what I did to solve it.
>
> Index: arm-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /product/tools/gdb/gdb/arm-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.9
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -c -r1.9 -r1.10
> *** arm-tdep.c 20 Sep 2002 17:11:31 -0000 1.9
> --- arm-tdep.c 19 Nov 2002 18:33:37 -0000 1.10
> ***************
> *** 1480,1485 ****
> --- 1480,1486 ----
> }
> }
>
> + sp = (sp + 3) & ~3;
> /* Return adjusted stack pointer. */
> return sp;
> }
>
OK, but with this change the alignment is being done *after* any arguments
that have to go onto the stack have been pushed. It should happen
*before*. What happens if you have?
struct f { char a; char b; char c;};
struct f g = {1,2,3};
struct f h (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e)
{
g.c = e;
return g;
}
and then call h from within the debugger. Is g.c set correctly?
My guess is that it won't, because the integer value for e will have been
pushed onto the stack incorrectly.
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-20 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-20 7:29 Kris Warkentin
2002-11-20 7:58 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-11-20 8:10 ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-20 8:21 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-11-20 8:26 ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-20 9:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-20 9:35 ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-26 14:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-27 1:18 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-11-20 10:37 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2002-11-20 10:59 ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-20 11:40 ` Kris Warkentin
2002-11-21 2:58 ` Richard Earnshaw
[not found] <200211272021.PAA04606@hub.ott.qnx.com>
2002-11-27 13:13 ` Kris Warkentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200211201837.gAKIbXv25319@pc960.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kewarken@qnx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox