* Question about TCP/IP stubs, gdb-5.2.1 @ 2002-09-17 8:28 Robert Bedichek 2002-09-17 8:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Robert Bedichek @ 2002-09-17 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb The only TCP/IP stub I found was for Wince. I need one for Linux. Does anyone have a pointer to a stub, the thing that runs on the target, or the machine being debugged, that is closer to what I need than the Wince stub included in 5.2.1? (The architecture is x86) Thanks in advance! Robert Bedichek ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about TCP/IP stubs, gdb-5.2.1 2002-09-17 8:28 Question about TCP/IP stubs, gdb-5.2.1 Robert Bedichek @ 2002-09-17 8:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-09-17 8:52 ` Robert Bedichek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-09-17 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Bedichek; +Cc: gdb On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:28:09AM -0700, Robert Bedichek wrote: > > The only TCP/IP stub I found was for Wince. I need one for Linux. Does > anyone have a pointer to a stub, the thing that runs on the target, or the > machine being debugged, that is closer to what I need than the Wince stub > included in 5.2.1? (The architecture is x86) Are you talking about application level debugging? If so, you want gdbserver, which is included in the GDB release. If you're talking about kernel level debugging, then TCP/IP is generally considered impractical from an interrupt context. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about TCP/IP stubs, gdb-5.2.1 2002-09-17 8:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-09-17 8:52 ` Robert Bedichek 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Robert Bedichek @ 2002-09-17 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb Thanks for the pointer to gdbserver, that might be the best starting point. What I want this for a connection to a full system simulator. I used to compile simulators directly with gdb, but this time I want them separated. There are seveal reasons, but one is that I want to be able to have thousands of simulators running for days in an LSF-managed farm. I want to be able to connect to a simulator, do some debugging, and disconnect, letting the simulator run some more. This is like attaching to processes with regular gdb. So what I plan to do at this point, unless someone has an even better suggestion, is to start with gdbserver, rip out the part that talks to a Linux process, and make it so that it can be compiled with the simulator and access the simulator data structures directly. Thanks again! On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:28:09AM -0700, Robert Bedichek wrote: > > > > The only TCP/IP stub I found was for Wince. I need one for Linux. Does > > anyone have a pointer to a stub, the thing that runs on the target, or the > > machine being debugged, that is closer to what I need than the Wince stub > > included in 5.2.1? (The architecture is x86) > > Are you talking about application level debugging? If so, you want > gdbserver, which is included in the GDB release. If you're talking > about kernel level debugging, then TCP/IP is generally considered > impractical from an interrupt context. > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-17 15:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-09-17 8:28 Question about TCP/IP stubs, gdb-5.2.1 Robert Bedichek 2002-09-17 8:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-09-17 8:52 ` Robert Bedichek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox