From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
Cc: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>, gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: struct environment
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 10:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020907173200.GA28687@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D7A371E.2070806@bothner.com>
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 10:27:58AM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> David Carlton wrote:
> >One interesting thing that's going on is that the classes in question
> >are all apparently "dynamically loaded".
>
> Yes. This code date back the the very early days of gcj, when we were
> basing it on the Kaffe run-time, which was JIT-based. Even the days
> it is possible for a class to be generated on-the-fly, or loaded from
> a .jar file containing bytecodes. Such a class will not have dwarf
> or other static symbols. So this was an attempt to extract the type
> information from a class from the run-time type information for a
> class instead of or in addition to the static symbols.
>
> Such an attempt runs into various assumptions of gdb, such as how
> symtabs are managed and reclaimed, so it was never very solid.
> We can't debug interpreted bytecode anyway, so it's not much use.
> Feel tree to tear this code out, but keep in mind that new Java
> classes may be created on the fly.
>
> I think the correct way to handle on-the-fly Java classes is to
> use a model similar to dynamically linked libraries. In both
> cases a program can execute library functions that bring in new
> code and new global symbols. The main difference is that there
> may be many more Java classes that are dynamically loaded then
> the number of shared libraries, which may effect the strategy
> used. Though if most classes are pre-compiled, we're talking
> at most hundreds, rather than thousands.
OK. At this point, then, I think the thing to do is ignore the Java
dynamic loading for now. If your changes break compilation of it, we
can #if 0 it out. Somewhere down the road, after when shared library
support has been multi-arched :), we can redo it that way.
Actually, this has potential - it would be nice to support multiple
dynamic loading mechanisms. See the XFree86 loader patches on
gdb-patches a while ago...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-07 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-05 13:50 David Carlton
2002-09-06 8:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-06 10:20 ` David Carlton
2002-09-06 10:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-06 11:56 ` David Carlton
2002-09-06 12:34 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-06 12:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-06 12:55 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-11 11:33 ` David Carlton
2002-09-11 11:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-11 12:27 ` David Carlton
2002-09-06 14:43 ` David Carlton
2002-09-06 14:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-06 14:57 ` mdebugread.c (was Re: struct environment) David Carlton
2002-09-06 15:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-10 17:25 ` struct environment David Carlton
2002-09-10 17:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-11 10:29 ` David Carlton
2002-09-11 10:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-11 12:33 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-10 17:36 ` David Carlton
2002-09-16 22:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-06 15:00 ` David Carlton
2002-09-06 16:37 ` Tom Tromey
2002-09-06 17:19 ` David Carlton
2002-09-07 10:26 ` Per Bothner
2002-09-07 10:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-09-09 11:18 ` David Carlton
2002-09-12 12:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-13 9:44 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 0:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 6:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 8:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 9:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 10:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 11:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 12:37 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 12:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-18 8:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 12:52 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-17 13:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 21:51 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-18 7:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-18 9:08 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 12:18 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 10:29 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 12:50 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-17 13:24 ` David Carlton
2002-09-18 22:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020907173200.GA28687@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=per@bothner.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox