From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Issue an internal warning on first deprecated function call
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020816011518.GA24067@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1020815223303.ZM7495@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:33:03PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Aug 15, 6:00pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > The problem behind this was discussed in:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-03/msg00227.html
> >
> > The idea is to issue an internal-warning on the first call to a
> > deprecated [multi-arch] function.
> >
> > The intent is to better alert the user to the possability that their GDB
> > is on its last legs.
> >
> > Thoughts? Variations on the idea?
>
> I think we should strive to just fix (eliminate) the calls to
> deprecated functions instead. However, there are times when it's too
> hard or can't be sufficiently tested.
>
> A variation on the above idea is to scan a newly created gdbarch
> struct to see if any deprecated functions are being used. If so,
> print only one message per session. (I.e, instead of seeing N
> messages from N deprecated function, you'd only see one message for
> the whole lot.) The nuisance factor could be cut back even further if
> we arrange for .gdbinit setting which can be used to disable such
> messages.
>
> This variation will also cause the message to be printed at a more
> predictable time, probably either at startup or just after a ``file''
> operation.
I definitely like this idea.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-16 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-15 15:01 Andrew Cagney
2002-08-15 15:33 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-15 18:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-08-15 18:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 6:31 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-16 6:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 7:09 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-16 7:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-18 11:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-19 18:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-20 6:19 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-20 23:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-21 6:07 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-21 8:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-21 8:52 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-21 9:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-22 0:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-22 5:43 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-21 10:09 ` Tom Tromey
2002-09-09 11:10 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020816011518.GA24067@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox