From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Issue an internal warning on first deprecated function call
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1020815223303.ZM7495@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> "Issue an internal warning on first deprecated function call" (Aug 15, 6:00pm)
On Aug 15, 6:00pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> The problem behind this was discussed in:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-03/msg00227.html
>
> The idea is to issue an internal-warning on the first call to a
> deprecated [multi-arch] function.
>
> The intent is to better alert the user to the possability that their GDB
> is on its last legs.
>
> Thoughts? Variations on the idea?
I think we should strive to just fix (eliminate) the calls to
deprecated functions instead. However, there are times when it's too
hard or can't be sufficiently tested.
A variation on the above idea is to scan a newly created gdbarch
struct to see if any deprecated functions are being used. If so,
print only one message per session. (I.e, instead of seeing N
messages from N deprecated function, you'd only see one message for
the whole lot.) The nuisance factor could be cut back even further if
we arrange for .gdbinit setting which can be used to disable such
messages.
This variation will also cause the message to be printed at a more
predictable time, probably either at startup or just after a ``file''
operation.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-15 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-15 15:01 Andrew Cagney
2002-08-15 15:33 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2002-08-15 18:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-15 18:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 6:31 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-16 6:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 7:09 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-16 7:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-18 11:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-19 18:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-20 6:19 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-20 23:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-21 6:07 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-21 8:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-21 8:52 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-21 9:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-22 0:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-22 5:43 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-08-21 10:09 ` Tom Tromey
2002-09-09 11:10 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1020815223303.ZM7495@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox