Re: Remote protocol extension - detaching

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

I'm not sure whether we can do that in a backwards-compatible way with
existing stubs.  It's a good idea, though - I like it :)

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:19:40PM -0500, William A. Gatliff wrote:
> ... or how about just adding some arguments to the detach packet?
> 
> b.g.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:37:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Right now, the standard behavior for a stub on detach is to wait for the
> > client to reconnect.  It would be convenient to have the normal local
> > execution behavior available, also: that is, on detach, resume the
> > application.  This could be done with or without leaving the stub running.
> > 
> > I'd like to commandeer the 'K' packet for this; 'd' and 'D' are already
> > taken.  Anyone have a better suggestion?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
> > MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
> 
> -- 
> Bill Gatliff
> bgat@billgatliff.com
> 

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer