From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25005 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2002 19:24:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24925 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 19:24:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 19:24:10 -0000 Received: from dsl254-114-118.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.114.118] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Zz4t-0008C6-00; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:24:11 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Zz4s-0006O8-00; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:24:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "William A. Gatliff" Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Remote protocol extension - detaching Message-ID: <20020731192410.GA24523@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "William A. Gatliff" , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020731183702.GA12324@nevyn.them.org> <20020731141940.B29193@saturn.billgatliff.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020731141940.B29193@saturn.billgatliff.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2 I'm not sure whether we can do that in a backwards-compatible way with existing stubs. It's a good idea, though - I like it :) On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:19:40PM -0500, William A. Gatliff wrote: > ... or how about just adding some arguments to the detach packet? > > b.g. > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:37:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Right now, the standard behavior for a stub on detach is to wait for the > > client to reconnect. It would be convenient to have the normal local > > execution behavior available, also: that is, on detach, resume the > > application. This could be done with or without leaving the stub running. > > > > I'd like to commandeer the 'K' packet for this; 'd' and 'D' are already > > taken. Anyone have a better suggestion? > > > > -- > > Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University > > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer > > -- > Bill Gatliff > bgat@billgatliff.com > -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer