Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Supported C++ compilers
@ 2001-12-08  9:09 Daniel Jacobowitz
  2001-12-08 10:25 ` Daniel Berlin
  2001-12-09  2:16 ` Arnaud Charlet
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2001-12-08  9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb

What other compilers besides GCC 2.x and GCC 3.3 do we support C++ in?  The
third ABI we support is HP's, so presumably the native HP/UX compiler.  Are
there any others; vendor compilers matching one of the GCC ABIs, for
instance?

Also, if anyone reading this has and can share access to the HP/UX compiler
in question, I'd tremendously appreciate it.  I can probably simplify quite
a bit of this code, but I'd like to do it without murdering the HP/UX
support.  If it's still current, at least.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Supported C++ compilers
  2001-12-08  9:09 Supported C++ compilers Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2001-12-08 10:25 ` Daniel Berlin
  2001-12-09  2:16 ` Arnaud Charlet
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2001-12-08 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb



On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> What other compilers besides GCC 2.x and GCC 3.3 do we support C++ in?  The
> third ABI we support is HP's, so presumably the native HP/UX compiler.  Are
> there any others; vendor compilers matching one of the GCC ABIs, for
> instance?

Intel's C++ 6.0 (not released yet) will be abi compatible with g++ 3.0.

Other than that, there really aren't that many more ABI's out there.

>
> Also, if anyone reading this has and can share access to the HP/UX compiler
> in question, I'd tremendously appreciate it.  I can probably simplify quite
> a bit of this code, but I'd like to do it without murdering the HP/UX
> support.  If it's still current, at least.

I have an account on a computer that has aCC on it, given to me for just
this purpose.

>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
> MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Supported C++ compilers
  2001-12-08  9:09 Supported C++ compilers Daniel Jacobowitz
  2001-12-08 10:25 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2001-12-09  2:16 ` Arnaud Charlet
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnaud Charlet @ 2001-12-09  2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb

I believe GDB is supposed to support the old Sun Forte ABI.

Arno


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Supported C++ compilers
  2001-12-10 11:30 Tanvir Hassan
@ 2001-12-10 11:58 ` Daniel Berlin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2001-12-10 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tanvir Hassan; +Cc: 'Arnaud Charlet', gdb


On Monday, December 10, 2001, at 02:29  PM, Tanvir Hassan wrote:

> Hi!
>
> If by old Sun Forte ABI you mean Sun Workshop 5 C++ or Forte 6 C++ 
> (which
> are really Sun C++ 5.0 and 5.3)
Um, no, Sun C++ 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 use a different ABI.
4.x used what is considered the "old forte ABI".

7.0 ea1 (Sun C++ 5.4) claims to be compatible with 5.0,5.1,5.2, and 5.3, 
so it hasn't changed abi, afaict.
--Dan


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: Supported C++ compilers
@ 2001-12-10 11:30 Tanvir Hassan
  2001-12-10 11:58 ` Daniel Berlin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tanvir Hassan @ 2001-12-10 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Arnaud Charlet', gdb

Hi!

If by old Sun Forte ABI you mean Sun Workshop 5 C++ or Forte 6 C++ (which
are really Sun C++ 5.0 and 5.3) I can say that it is NOT SUPPORTED and I got
a pretty nasty response from the group when I asked if it is supported (OK,
so I had read the Sun PR which said that the Sun ABI was "compliant" and I
asked if GDB will interoperate with a "compliant" ABI and that got some
feathers ruffled :-).  But I would REALLY appreciate it if you can verify
this is true and I can use GDB instead of the HORRIBLY, HORRIBLY broken dbx
that Sun ships with C++ 5.0 and 5.3 (I cannot switch to GDB yet because my
3rd party libraries are only certified against Sun C++ which does not debug
with GDB).

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnaud Charlet [mailto:charlet@ACT-Europe.FR]
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 2:17 AM
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Supported C++ compilers


I believe GDB is supposed to support the old Sun Forte ABI.

Arno


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-10 19:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-08  9:09 Supported C++ compilers Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-08 10:25 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-12-09  2:16 ` Arnaud Charlet
2001-12-10 11:30 Tanvir Hassan
2001-12-10 11:58 ` Daniel Berlin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox