Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "William A. Gatliff" <bgat@saturn.billgatliff.com>
To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011018161003.A3059@saturn.billgatliff.com> (raw)

Guys:


I was recently working with Cygwin 1.3.2, doing remote serial
debugging with an ARM Evaluator-7T board using gdb-5.0.  Everything
was just peachy.

Then I upgraded, and things got bad in a hurry.  :^(

Cygwin 1.3.3 seems less stable serialio-wise than 1.3.2.  After
several days of trying, I have yet to establish a complete serial
connection with the board.  And 1.3.3 also seems to require/support
only hardware flow control on the serial lines, where 1.3.2 did not.

I'm running on Win98SE, and can test on NT4 and 2000 if necessary.

At this point, I would be happy just to be able to get Cygwin 1.3.2
back, but alas, I haven't found an archive of it anywhere on the 'net.

To make matters worse, a magazine article I'm writing that describes
how to use Cygwin and GNU tools for arm-elf development is set to
appear in in the December issue of Circuit Cellar Ink magazine.  The
article was written for 1.3.2, and won't currently work with 1.3.3
unless I can figure out what's going on by next Wednesday.  I really
would rather avoid disappointing a new crop of Cygwin and GNU tool
users.

I'm developing patches for gdb-5.0, binutils-2.11.2 and gcc-2.95.3 to
make them build under 1.3.3 (to fix the new export conflicts), but I
haven't figured out what the problem with serial communications is.
If I can't fix the problem, then the article is basically doa.

A draft of the manuscript for the article is at:

http://billgatliff.com/articles/gnu/gnu-arm7t/index.html .

Suggestions, patches, signs of moral support, etc. would all be most
graciously accepted.  Thanks for the help,


b.g.
-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com


             reply	other threads:[~2001-10-18 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-18 14:28 William A. Gatliff [this message]
2001-10-18 20:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-10-19  6:56   ` William A. Gatliff
2001-10-19  9:14     ` Christopher Faylor
2001-10-19  9:45     ` Grant Edwards
2001-10-19 10:02       ` Christopher Faylor
2001-10-19 11:30         ` William A. Gatliff
2001-10-19 12:12           ` William A. Gatliff
2001-10-19 14:55             ` William A. Gatliff
2001-10-19 15:07               ` Christopher Faylor
2001-10-20  3:06       ` Robert Collins
2001-10-20 13:08         ` William A. Gatliff
2001-10-20 18:09           ` Robert Collins
2001-10-20 17:41         ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-19  8:26 ` Grant Edwards
2001-10-19  9:36   ` Fernando Nasser
2001-10-21  9:48 ` Fernando Nasser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011018161003.A3059@saturn.billgatliff.com \
    --to=bgat@saturn.billgatliff.com \
    --cc=cygwin@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox