From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: prgregset_t vs gdb_gregset_t on Linux: not the same!
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 15:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010608155907.A21698@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010608132730.A4056@nevyn.them.org>
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:27:30PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> In proc-service.c, we call fill_gregset and supply_gregset with a
> prgregset_t cast to a gdb_gregset_t *. The problem is, they really are
> different. We can mostly get away with this, because in almost all cases
> glibc won't do anything with the gregset except pass it back to gdb again
> (if the process has terminated, it will memset something the size of a
> prgregset_t, though...).
The matching question here is that core-regset.c's fetch_core_registers
calls supply_gregset with a gregset_t, but supply_gregset is prototyped
with a gdb_gregset_t. That doesn't work very well either.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-08 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-08 13:27 Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-06-08 15:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2001-06-08 22:14 ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-09 11:50 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-06-09 13:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-06-10 0:23 ` H . J . Lu
[not found] ` <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010610105519.5638E-100000@is>
2001-06-10 1:20 ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-11 6:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-06-11 8:58 ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-11 10:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-06-11 9:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-06-11 9:45 ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-11 10:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-06-11 10:45 ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-09 15:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-06-09 11:50 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-06-09 15:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010608155907.A21698@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox