From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: eliz@is.elta.co.il
Cc: dj@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
binutils@sources.redhat.com, cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Another RFC: regex in libiberty
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 09:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010608091753L.mitchell@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9003-Fri08Jun2001100651+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
>> The two contenders seem to be a modified GNU regex and the
>> ever-popular Henry Spencer's regex. Does anyone have any
>> strong opinions for either of these, or against any regex in
>> libiberty at all?
My opinion may or may not matter on this debate, but here it is.
Since libiberty for use in GNU software, we must use GNU regex. If
GNU regex is slow, we should make it faster.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-08 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Daniel>
[not found] ` <Vogel's>
[not found] ` <message>
[not found] ` <of>
[not found] ` <Mon,>
[not found] ` <01>
[not found] ` <Nov>
[not found] ` <1999>
[not found] ` <14:25:01>
[not found] ` <+0100>
[not found] ` <381D94AD.B37EC167@grafzahl.de>
1999-11-08 8:54 ` go32-nat.c compilation problem Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <Fri,>
[not found] ` <08>
[not found] ` <Jun>
[not found] ` <2001>
[not found] ` <10:06:51>
[not found] ` <+0300>
2001-06-07 18:27 ` Another RFC: regex in libiberty DJ Delorie
2001-06-07 18:31 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2001-06-07 18:33 ` DJ Delorie
2001-06-07 18:43 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2001-06-08 0:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-08 9:18 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2001-06-08 9:59 ` Zack Weinberg
2001-06-08 10:05 ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-08 10:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-08 10:39 ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-08 10:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-11 22:49 ` Jim Blandy
2001-06-11 23:51 ` Randall R Schulz
2001-06-12 6:48 ` Jim Blandy
2001-06-08 1:15 ` Pierre Muller
2001-06-08 1:36 ` About struct bpp_transfer_params ±èµæÃß
2001-06-08 7:43 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-06-09 13:34 ` Another RFC: regex in libiberty Andrew Cagney
[not found] <Eli>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010608091753L.mitchell@codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=cygwin@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox