Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com, cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Another RFC: regex in libiberty
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 18:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200106080127.VAA01308@greed.delorie.com> (raw)

[More lists added to get a wider audience]

I didn't get a clear feeling about what people wanted wrt this.  I saw
three people propose three versions of regex, not much to go on.  Is
this a big deal?  Will it really get used by everyone who currently
has their own regex?  Is it important to try to use a BSD-licensed
regex to minimize future problems?

The two contenders seem to be a modified GNU regex and the
ever-popular Henry Spencer's regex.  Does anyone have any strong
opinions for either of these, or against any regex in libiberty at
all?


         reply	other threads:[~2001-06-07 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Daniel>
     [not found] ` <Vogel's>
     [not found]   ` <message>
     [not found]     ` <of>
     [not found]       ` <Mon,>
     [not found]         ` <01>
     [not found]           ` <Nov>
     [not found]             ` <1999>
     [not found]               ` <14:25:01>
     [not found]                 ` <+0100>
     [not found]                   ` <381D94AD.B37EC167@grafzahl.de>
1999-11-08  8:54                     ` go32-nat.c compilation problem Pierre Muller
     [not found]       ` <Fri,>
     [not found]         ` <08>
     [not found]           ` <Jun>
     [not found]             ` <2001>
     [not found]               ` <10:06:51>
     [not found]                 ` <+0300>
2001-06-07 18:27                   ` DJ Delorie [this message]
2001-06-07 18:31                     ` Another RFC: regex in libiberty Ian Lance Taylor
2001-06-07 18:33                       ` DJ Delorie
2001-06-07 18:43                         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2001-06-08  0:11                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-08  9:18                       ` Mark Mitchell
2001-06-08  9:59                       ` Zack Weinberg
2001-06-08 10:05                         ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-08 10:31                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-08 10:39                             ` H . J . Lu
2001-06-08 10:37                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-06-11 22:49                       ` Jim Blandy
2001-06-11 23:51                         ` Randall R Schulz
2001-06-12  6:48                         ` Jim Blandy
2001-06-08  1:15                     ` Pierre Muller
2001-06-08  1:36                       ` About struct bpp_transfer_params ±èµæÁß
2001-06-08  7:43                         ` Fernando Nasser
2001-06-09 13:34                     ` Another RFC: regex in libiberty Andrew Cagney
     [not found] <Eli>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200106080127.VAA01308@greed.delorie.com \
    --to=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=cygwin@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox