From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com>
To: kevinb@cygnus.com
Cc: jtc@redback.com, kettenis@wins.uva.nl, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unified watchpoints for x86 platforms
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200102160729.CAA01182@indy.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1010216000953.ZM9629@ocotillo.lan>
> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:09:53 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
>
> I think the answer is to use your best judgement. Regardless of
> whether you pass the pid in or simply use inferior_pid, your new
> watchpoint code is going to have to eventually be changed to use
> a different representation of the execution context. I happen to
> think that it might actually change less if you pass a parameter, but
> after thinking about it a bit more, I can see why someone else might
> hold the opposite opinion.
Okay, thanks for the feedback. I'll sleep on this and then decide.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-15 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200009070855.EAA00749@albacore>
[not found] ` <200009071500.LAA07756@indy.delorie.com>
[not found] ` <200009081529.e88FTjx15960@debye.wins.uva.nl>
2001-02-10 7:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-10 10:19 ` H . J . Lu
2001-02-10 11:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 3:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 8:17 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15 9:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 10:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15 13:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 10:41 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-15 13:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 14:46 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-15 16:11 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-15 23:29 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2001-02-24 10:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-27 3:28 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-27 10:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-21 15:59 ` [RFA] " Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 23:30 ` [RFC] " Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <eliz@delorie.com>
2001-02-16 0:45 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-16 10:52 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-16 0:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15 9:08 ` H . J . Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200102160729.CAA01182@indy.delorie.com \
--to=eliz@delorie.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jtc@redback.com \
--cc=kettenis@wins.uva.nl \
--cc=kevinb@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox