Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com>
To: kevinb@cygnus.com
Cc: kettenis@wins.uva.nl, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unified watchpoints for x86 platforms
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200102152125.QAA15548@indy.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1010215184135.ZM8866@ocotillo.lan>

> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:41:35 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
> > 
> > Is there any particular reason why you need the PID argument?  AFAICS
> > it will always be equal to INFERIOR_PID, so I think we can do without
> > it.  This is also true for the other i386_hwbp_* functions you're
> > proposing.
> 
> I think it'd be better to not rely on ``inferior_pid''.  I would
> rather see the explicitly passed.  There will come a day when GDB
> is able to debug more than one process at a time and to perpetuate
> reliance on inferior pid would be short sighted.

I have two opposite opinions here.  We need to resolve this somehow.

> I have read the rest of Eli's proposal as well as Mark's comments and
> I agree with the rest of Mark's remarks.

Thanks for the feedback.


  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-15 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200009070855.EAA00749@albacore>
     [not found] ` <200009071500.LAA07756@indy.delorie.com>
     [not found]   ` <200009081529.e88FTjx15960@debye.wins.uva.nl>
2001-02-10  7:34     ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-10 10:19       ` H . J . Lu
2001-02-10 11:28         ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15  3:48       ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15  8:17         ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15  9:32           ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 10:33             ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15 13:26               ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 10:41           ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-15 13:26             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2001-02-15 14:46               ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-15 16:11                 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-15 23:29                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-24 10:14                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-27  3:28                     ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-27 10:57                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-03-21 15:59                       ` [RFA] " Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-15 23:30                 ` [RFC] " Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]                   ` <eliz@delorie.com>
2001-02-16  0:45                     ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-16 10:52                   ` J.T. Conklin
2001-02-16  0:00                 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-02-15  9:08         ` H . J . Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200102152125.QAA15548@indy.delorie.com \
    --to=eliz@delorie.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@wins.uva.nl \
    --cc=kevinb@cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox