From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts)
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: "Marc Khouzam" <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>, <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Queries and frontends
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19053.2107.342469.683795@totara.tehura.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m37hxwm3wr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
> Nick> Here's a revised patch for my original request. It doesn't help
> Nick> with issues relating to GDB/MI but just uses the "server prefix"
> Nick> instead of a special option.
>
> My initial reaction to this was to think that defaulted_query should
> respect server_command. Is there a case where this would do the wrong
> thing?
I don't quite follow. AFAIK defaulted_query knows nothing about
server_command. I guess it would be possible to make GDB never query when
the server prefix is used but the long term goal is to remove annotations.
I'm just proposing that "record stop" doesn't need confirmation when the
server prefix is used. Since "record stop" is new to GDB 7.0 that won't
break/change existing behaviour so I don't see how it can do the wrong
thing if it's properly implemented.
Hui has suggested adding a special command but I don't understand how his
proposed "maintenance print target-stack" relates to queries.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 3:18 Marc Khouzam
2009-07-21 6:13 ` Nick Roberts
2009-07-21 8:26 ` Hui Zhu
2009-07-21 8:29 ` Hui Zhu
2009-07-21 11:51 ` Nick Roberts
2009-07-22 6:11 ` Hui Zhu
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Michael Snyder
2009-07-21 18:37 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-07-21 18:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-07-21 23:29 ` Nick Roberts
2009-07-22 13:38 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-07-26 5:04 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-27 1:52 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2009-07-27 16:17 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-28 1:55 ` Nick Roberts
2009-07-29 21:13 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-29 23:56 ` [PATCH] util.c + doc [was Re: [RFC] Queries and frontends] Nick Roberts
2009-07-30 0:28 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-07-30 3:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-08-04 16:32 ` [PATCH] util.c + doc Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19053.2107.342469.683795@totara.tehura.co.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox