From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>,
gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: should minimal symbols be able to force lookup_symbol to return NULL?
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 14:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15814.63965.357678.250286@localhost.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1pttldl9y.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
David Carlton writes:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:18:17 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
> > David Carlton writes:
>
> >> I'll wait until my first stab at refactoring (which, I hope, preserves
> >> the current behavior exactly) (well, almost exactly: there's one or
> >> two changes which I think of as bugfixes, but it's quite careful about
> >> control flow) gets approved before I submit an RFA for that.
> >> Certainly I'm glad that Joel has appeared and is willing to run
> >> proposed changes through the testsuite on HP/UX machines.
> >>
>
> > I sent out a reply last night.
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00026.html
>
> Yes, I saw it, thanks! I just didn't have time to respond to it
> properly yet: my actual job has rudely intervened. (Plus, Michael
> Snyder was kind enough to invite me over to Red Hat today.) But I'm
> almost done entering in homework grades, so hopefully I'll be able to
Ah, fail them, fail them all! :-)
> come up with a proper response later today; if not today, tomorrow.
No problem. I thought it got lost, I had some mail glitches recently.
Elena
>
> David Carlton
> carlton@math.stanford.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-04 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-28 11:16 David Carlton
2002-10-30 15:15 ` David Carlton
2002-11-04 13:08 ` Jim Blandy
2002-11-04 14:14 ` David Carlton
2002-11-04 14:22 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-11-04 14:26 ` David Carlton
2002-11-04 14:55 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2002-11-04 14:57 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15814.63965.357678.250286@localhost.redhat.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox