From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-10952-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30745 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2002 22:55:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30698 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2002 22:55:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2002 22:55:25 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA4MWww22149
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:32:58 -0500
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA4MtOf17814
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:55:24 -0500
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (IDENT:Ox7IhILGCwTs1r7+wRflaX80yprqjgGI@tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA4MtMT16780;
	Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:55:22 -0500
Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469)
	id 10E47FF79; Mon,  4 Nov 2002 17:51:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15814.63965.357678.250286@localhost.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 14:55:00 -0000
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>,
   gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: should minimal symbols be able to force lookup_symbol to return NULL?
In-Reply-To: <ro1pttldl9y.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
References: <ro1vg3mtlv4.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
	<ro18z0fr023.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
	<vt2wunthx9k.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com>
	<ro1znspdltd.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
	<15814.61993.475200.691004@localhost.redhat.com>
	<ro1pttldl9y.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2

David Carlton writes:
 > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:18:17 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
 > > David Carlton writes:
 > 
 > >> I'll wait until my first stab at refactoring (which, I hope, preserves
 > >> the current behavior exactly) (well, almost exactly: there's one or
 > >> two changes which I think of as bugfixes, but it's quite careful about
 > >> control flow) gets approved before I submit an RFA for that.
 > >> Certainly I'm glad that Joel has appeared and is willing to run
 > >> proposed changes through the testsuite on HP/UX machines.
 > >> 
 > 
 > > I sent out a reply last night. 
 > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00026.html
 > 
 > Yes, I saw it, thanks!  I just didn't have time to respond to it
 > properly yet: my actual job has rudely intervened.  (Plus, Michael
 > Snyder was kind enough to invite me over to Red Hat today.)  But I'm
 > almost done entering in homework grades, so hopefully I'll be able to

Ah, fail them, fail them all! :-)

 > come up with a proper response later today; if not today, tomorrow.

No problem. I thought it got lost, I had some mail glitches recently.

Elena


 > 
 > David Carlton
 > carlton@math.stanford.edu