* Re: remote packet size for memory read
[not found] ` <51D292E7.9040900@groessler.org>
@ 2013-07-05 14:26 ` Pedro Alves
2013-07-24 23:00 ` Philippe Waroquiers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2013-07-05 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Groessler; +Cc: gdb
On 07/02/2013 09:44 AM, Christian Groessler wrote:
I haven't analyzed the issue thoroughly, but it's quite plausible
you're right.
If you don't plan on contributing fixes, could you file (separate) bug
reports for these, so they don't get lost?
Thanks,
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: remote packet size for memory read
2013-07-05 14:26 ` remote packet size for memory read Pedro Alves
@ 2013-07-24 23:00 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2013-07-25 7:07 ` Christian Groessler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Waroquiers @ 2013-07-24 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: Christian Groessler, gdb
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 15:25 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 09:44 AM, Christian Groessler wrote:
>
> I haven't analyzed the issue thoroughly, but it's quite plausible
> you're right.
Problem of GDB asking to read packetsize/2 has also be detected with
the Valgrind gdbserver, which expects that
nr_bytes_requested_in_m_packet*2 + 4 <= packetsize
but GDB only guarantees
nr_bytes_requested_in_m_packet*2 <= packetsize
> If you don't plan on contributing fixes, could you file (separate) bug
> reports for these, so they don't get lost?
Have these been filed ? Not seen ...
>
> Thanks,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: remote packet size for memory read
2013-07-24 23:00 ` Philippe Waroquiers
@ 2013-07-25 7:07 ` Christian Groessler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Groessler @ 2013-07-25 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Waroquiers; +Cc: Pedro Alves, gdb
On 07/25/13 01:00, Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 15:25 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 07/02/2013 09:44 AM, Christian Groessler wrote:
>>
>> I haven't analyzed the issue thoroughly, but it's quite plausible
>> you're right.
> Problem of GDB asking to read packetsize/2 has also be detected with
> the Valgrind gdbserver, which expects that
> nr_bytes_requested_in_m_packet*2 + 4 <= packetsize
> but GDB only guarantees
> nr_bytes_requested_in_m_packet*2 <= packetsize
>
>
>> If you don't plan on contributing fixes, could you file (separate) bug
>> reports for these, so they don't get lost?
> Have these been filed ? Not seen ...
Haven't come around to do it yet, sorry.
I also wanted to check with valgrind before....
regards,
chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-25 7:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <51D29213.2050801@groessler.org>
[not found] ` <51D292E7.9040900@groessler.org>
2013-07-05 14:26 ` remote packet size for memory read Pedro Alves
2013-07-24 23:00 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2013-07-25 7:07 ` Christian Groessler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox