incomplete binutils patch in gdb

incomplete binutils patch in gdb

[Thiago Jung Bauermann]

Hi,

I just noticed that this commit in the opcodes directory:

2008-08-01  Peter Bergner  <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>

        * ppc-dis.c (powerpc_init_dialect): Handle power7 and vsx options.
        (print_insn_powerpc): Prepend 'vs' when printing VSX registers.
        (print_ppc_disassembler_options): Document -Mpower7 and -Mvsx.
        * ppc-opc.c (insert_xt6): New static function.
        (extract_xt6): Likewise.
        (insert_xa6): Likewise.
        (extract_xa6: Likewise.
        (insert_xb6): Likewise.
        (extract_xb6): Likewise.
        (insert_xb6s): Likewise.
        (extract_xb6s): Likewise.
        (XS6, XT6, XA6, XB6, XB6S, DM, XX3, XX3DM, XX1_MASK, XX3_MASK,
        XX3DM_MASK, PPCVSX): New.
        (powerpc_opcodes): Add opcodes "lxvd2x", "lxvd2ux", "stxvd2x",
        "stxvd2ux", "xxmrghd", "xxmrgld", "xxpermdi", "xvmovdp", "xvcpsgndp".

is incomplete in GDB CVS. It misses the changes in ppc-opc.c. I checked
out binutils CVS and it's fine there. Does anyone know what's going on?
-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

Re: incomplete binutils patch in gdb

[Andreas Schwab]

Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com> writes:

> is incomplete in GDB CVS. It misses the changes in ppc-opc.c. I checked
> out binutils CVS and it's fine there. Does anyone know what's going on?

The gdb and binutils repositories are one and the same.  Are you sure
you haven't accidentally set a sticky tag?  (Use cvs up -A to reset it.)

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Re: incomplete binutils patch in gdb

[Thiago Jung Bauermann]

El sáb, 28-02-2009 a las 17:51 +0100, Andreas Schwab escribió:
> Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > is incomplete in GDB CVS. It misses the changes in ppc-opc.c. I checked
> > out binutils CVS and it's fine there. Does anyone know what's going on?
> 
> The gdb and binutils repositories are one and the same.  Are you sure
> you haven't accidentally set a sticky tag?  (Use cvs up -A to reset it.)

Indeed, I checked out the GDB CVS tree again, and things are normal
there.

But the GDB git mirror has the same problem that my old CVS checkout
had. In fact, that's why I didn't think it was a problem with my CVS
checkout. Perhaps this is some weird limitation of CVS when doing
updates? I don't know...
-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center